Message ID | 20240229170115.159450-1-stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series |
|
Related | show |
Just to clarify. This patch fails to run on master. I wanted to collect some feedback on the overall idea and if my assumptions in the tests are correct. Cheers, Stefan Am 29.02.24 um 18:01 schrieb Stefan Klug: > These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at > the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. > > This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by > calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. > > Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch > with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a > current master :-) > > Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. > Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in > the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. > Which is exactly what this test shall proove. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> > --- > src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + > src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- > src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- > src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ > 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > #include <gtest/gtest.h> > > #include "environment.h" > +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > #include "simple_capture.h" > > using namespace libcamera; > @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, > testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), > testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), > SingleStream::nameParameters); > + > +/* > + * Test Per frame controls > + */ > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > +} > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ > 'capture_test.cpp', > 'environment.cpp', > 'main.cpp', > + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', > 'simple_capture.cpp', > + 'time_sheet.cpp', > ]) > > lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..70fc44ac > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls > + */ > +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > + > +#include <gtest/gtest.h> > + > +#include "time_sheet.h" > + > +using namespace libcamera; > + > +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) > + : SimpleCapture(camera) > +{ > +} > + > +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) > +{ > + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); > + /* Ensure defined default values */ > + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); > + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); > + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > + > + if (controls) { > + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); > + } > + > + start(&ctrls); > + > + queueCount_ = 0; > + captureCount_ = 0; > + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; > + > + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); > + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; > + return timeSheet; > +} > + > +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) > +{ > + queueCount_++; > + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) > + return 0; > + > + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > + if (ts) { > + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); > + } > + > + return camera_->queueRequest(request); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) > +{ > + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > + if (ts) { > + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); > + } > + > + captureCount_++; > + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { > + loop_->exit(0); > + return; > + } > + > + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); > + if (queueRequest(request)) > + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() > +{ > + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); > + > + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ > + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { > + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); > + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); > + queueRequest(request.get()); > + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); > + } > + > + /* Run capture session. */ > + loop_ = new EventLoop(); > + loop_->exec(); > + stop(); > + delete loop_; > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + > + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > + //wait a few frames to settle > + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); > + ts.printAllInfos(); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); > + > + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > + /* > + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). > + * This should be investigated. > + */ > + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > + > + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > + > + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > + //wait a few frames to settle > + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > + > + /* No increase just before setting gain */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > + /* > + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation > + */ > + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > + > + /* No increase just after setting gain */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); > + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() > +{ > + ControlList startValues; > + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > + > + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); > + > + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ > + > + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); > + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); > + > + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ > + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); > + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); > +} > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..e783f024 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls > + */ > + > +#pragma once > + > +#include <memory> > + > +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > + > +#include "../common/event_loop.h" > + > +#include "simple_capture.h" > +#include "time_sheet.h" > + > +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture > +{ > +public: > + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > + > + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > + void runCaptureSession(); > + > + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); > + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > + > + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; > + > + unsigned int queueCount_; > + unsigned int captureCount_; > + unsigned int captureLimit_; > + > + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; > +}; > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) > } > } > > -void SimpleCapture::start() > +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) > { > Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() > > camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); > > - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > } > > void SimpleCapture::stop() > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: > SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > virtual ~SimpleCapture(); > > - void start(); > + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > void stop(); > > virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..9a0e6544 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * time_sheet.cpp > + */ > +#include "time_sheet.h" > + > +#include <sstream> > +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > + > +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" > +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" > + > +using namespace libcamera; > + > +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) > +{ > + return (double)*data; > +} > + > +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) > +{ > + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); > +} > + > +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) > +{ > + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); > + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { > + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); > + if (in.isValid()) { > + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); > + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); > + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); > + > + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; > + int pixelStride; > + > + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { > + case formats::NV12: > + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; > + pixelStride = 1; > + break; > + case formats::SRGGB10: > + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; > + pixelStride = 2; > + break; > + default: > + std::stringstream s; > + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; > + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); > + } > + > + double sum = 0; > + int w = 20; > + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; > + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; > + > + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { > + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; > + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { > + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); > + } > + } > + sum = sum / (w * w); > + return sum; > + } > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) > + : controls_(idmap) > +{ > +} > + > +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) > +{ > + metadata_ = request->metadata(); > + > + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); > + if (previous) { > + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); > + } > + sequence_ = request->sequence(); > +} > + > +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() > +{ > + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; > + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; > + > + if (!metadata_.empty()) { > + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; > + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); > + assert(idMap); > + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { > + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; > + } > + } > +} > + > +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) > +{ > + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; > + if (!entry) > + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); > + return *entry; > +} > + > +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) > +{ > + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); > +} > + > +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) > +{ > + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); > + auto &entry = get(sequence); > + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; > + if (sequence >= 1) { > + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); > + } > + > + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); > +} > + > +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() > +{ > + for (auto entry : entries_) { > + if (entry) > + entry->printInfo(); > + } > +} > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..c155763c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * time_sheet.h > + */ > + > +#pragma once > + > +#include <future> > +#include <vector> > + > +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > + > +class TimeSheetEntry > +{ > +public: > + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); > + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; > + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; > + > + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; > + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; > + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); > + void printInfo(); > + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; > + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; > + > +private: > + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; > + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; > + libcamera::ControlList controls_; > + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; > + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; > +}; > + > +class TimeSheet > +{ > +public: > + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) > + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; > + > + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); > + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > + void printAllInfos(); > + > + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; > + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); > + > +private: > + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; > + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; > +};
Hi Stefan, Some quick review notes. I'm happy to see a test that actually tries to validate the DelayedControls implementations, and considers the real effects on the sensor. We try to break patches down to single topic commits, so here I can see at least - The introduction of the TimeSheet helper class - Fix the SimpleCapture::start() to accept a control list - Add per-frame-control tests. Quoting Stefan Klug (2024-02-29 17:01:15) > These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at > the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. > > This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by > calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. > > Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch > with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a > current master :-) I love good theories! ;-) I'm curious to see what happens on master and other platforms. > Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. > Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in > the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. > Which is exactly what this test shall proove. 'prove' ;-) > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> > --- > src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + > src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- > src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- > src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ > 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > #include <gtest/gtest.h> > > #include "environment.h" > +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > #include "simple_capture.h" > > using namespace libcamera; > @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, > testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), > testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), > SingleStream::nameParameters); > + > +/* > + * Test Per frame controls > + */ > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > +} > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ > 'capture_test.cpp', > 'environment.cpp', > 'main.cpp', > + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', > 'simple_capture.cpp', > + 'time_sheet.cpp', > ]) > > lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..70fc44ac > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls > + */ > +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > + > +#include <gtest/gtest.h> > + > +#include "time_sheet.h" > + > +using namespace libcamera; > + > +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) > + : SimpleCapture(camera) > +{ > +} > + > +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) > +{ > + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); > + /* Ensure defined default values */ > + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); > + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); > + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > + > + if (controls) { > + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); > + } No need for { } on a single line statement. if (controls) ctrls.merge(*controls, true); is sufficient in our code style. > + > + start(&ctrls); > + > + queueCount_ = 0; > + captureCount_ = 0; > + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; > + > + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); > + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; I'm curious. Why shared and not make_unique? Is it kept / shared in multiple locations? I guess I'll see later. > + return timeSheet; > +} > + > +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) > +{ > + queueCount_++; > + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) Should this return an error as it's /not/ queueing? Maybe not essential ... lets see how it's used... Probably not as we just want to stop queueing and we still want to wait for the requests queued to complete... > + return 0; > + > + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > + if (ts) { > + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); > + } Single line so no braces, same elsewhere. > + > + return camera_->queueRequest(request); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) > +{ > + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > + if (ts) { > + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); > + } > + > + captureCount_++; > + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { > + loop_->exit(0); > + return; > + } > + > + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); > + if (queueRequest(request)) > + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() > +{ > + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); > + > + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ > + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { > + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); > + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); > + queueRequest(request.get()); > + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); > + } > + > + /* Run capture session. */ > + loop_ = new EventLoop(); > + loop_->exec(); > + stop(); > + delete loop_; > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + > + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > + //wait a few frames to settle /* Single line comment style. */ > + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); > + ts.printAllInfos(); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); > + > + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; I'd wrap this a little, but it's better to keep the comment in one. Perhaps: EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > + /* > + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). > + * This should be investigated. > + */ indentation is broken here. Also lines could be wrapped to target 80chars. > + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > + > + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > + > + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; Same here, I'd wrap the message to the line below. But that's all we can do here I think. "changed too much2 frames" probably needs cleaning up. > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > + //wait a few frames to settle > + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > + > + /* No increase just before setting gain */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > + /* > + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation > + */ Same indentation issues here, and wrapping where possible. > + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > + > + /* No increase just after setting gain */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ "latest */" > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); > + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ "latest */" > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() > +{ > + ControlList startValues; > + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > + > + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); > + > + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ > + > + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); > + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); > + > + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ > + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); > + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); > +} > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..e783f024 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls > + */ > + > +#pragma once > + > +#include <memory> > + > +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > + > +#include "../common/event_loop.h" > + > +#include "simple_capture.h" > +#include "time_sheet.h" > + > +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture > +{ > +public: > + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > + > + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > + void runCaptureSession(); > + > + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); > + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > + > + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; > + > + unsigned int queueCount_; > + unsigned int captureCount_; > + unsigned int captureLimit_; > + > + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; > +}; > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) > } > } > > -void SimpleCapture::start() > +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) > { > Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() > > camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); > > - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > } > > void SimpleCapture::stop() > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: > SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > virtual ~SimpleCapture(); > > - void start(); > + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > void stop(); I would suggest breaking out the change here that enables setting controls at SimpleCapture::start() to it's own patch. > > virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..9a0e6544 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp I think introducting TimeSheet can be a separate patch to make it clearer. > @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * time_sheet.cpp > + */ > +#include "time_sheet.h" > + > +#include <sstream> > +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > + > +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" > +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" > + > +using namespace libcamera; > + > +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) > +{ > + return (double)*data; Oh, from the name "calcPixelMean" I was expecting a calculation, not just a cast. Maybe "double readPixelNV12()" or something. I think Laurent started looking at some 'image' type classes to tackle something similar to this problem. > +} > + > +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) > +{ > + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); > +} > + > +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) > +{ > + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); > + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { > + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); > + if (in.isValid()) { > + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); > + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); > + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); > + > + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; > + int pixelStride; > + > + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { > + case formats::NV12: > + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; > + pixelStride = 1; > + break; > + case formats::SRGGB10: > + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; > + pixelStride = 2; > + break; > + default: > + std::stringstream s; > + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; > + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); > + } > + > + double sum = 0; > + int w = 20; > + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; > + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; > + > + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { > + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; > + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { > + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); > + } > + } > + sum = sum / (w * w); > + return sum; > + } > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) > + : controls_(idmap) > +{ > +} > + > +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) > +{ > + metadata_ = request->metadata(); > + > + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); > + if (previous) { > + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); > + } > + sequence_ = request->sequence(); > +} > + > +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() > +{ > + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; > + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; > + > + if (!metadata_.empty()) { > + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; > + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); > + assert(idMap); > + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { > + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; > + } > + } > +} > + > +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) > +{ > + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; > + if (!entry) > + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); > + return *entry; > +} > + > +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) > +{ > + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); > +} > + > +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) > +{ > + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); > + auto &entry = get(sequence); > + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; > + if (sequence >= 1) { > + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); > + } > + > + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); > +} > + > +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() > +{ > + for (auto entry : entries_) { > + if (entry) > + entry->printInfo(); > + } > +} > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..c155763c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * time_sheet.h > + */ > + > +#pragma once > + > +#include <future> > +#include <vector> > + > +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > + > +class TimeSheetEntry > +{ > +public: > + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); > + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; > + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; > + > + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; > + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; > + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); > + void printInfo(); > + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; > + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; > + > +private: > + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; > + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; > + libcamera::ControlList controls_; > + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; > + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; > +}; > + > +class TimeSheet > +{ > +public: > + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) > + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; > + > + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); > + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > + void printAllInfos(); > + > + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; > + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); > + > +private: > + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; > + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; > +}; > -- > 2.40.1 >
Hi Stefan Thanks for posting this and re-starting the discussion of per-frame controls. Could you perhaps just summarise exactly what you mean by per-frame controls, that is to say, what is being tested here? Eye-balling the code, I think I understood that: * You are setting controls in a specific request. * When that request completes, you are expecting the controls to have taken effect in the images that were returned with that request (but not earlier). But I wasn't totally sure - have I understood that correctly? Also, do we know if any other pipeline handlers implement this behaviour? Do folks think that all pipeline handlers should implement this behaviour? Thanks again! David On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:01, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at > the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. > > This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by > calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. > > Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch > with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a > current master :-) > > Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. > Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in > the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. > Which is exactly what this test shall proove. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> > --- > src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + > src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- > src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- > src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ > src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ > 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > #include <gtest/gtest.h> > > #include "environment.h" > +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > #include "simple_capture.h" > > using namespace libcamera; > @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, > testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), > testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), > SingleStream::nameParameters); > + > +/* > + * Test Per frame controls > + */ > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > +} > + > +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) > +{ > + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > +} > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ > 'capture_test.cpp', > 'environment.cpp', > 'main.cpp', > + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', > 'simple_capture.cpp', > + 'time_sheet.cpp', > ]) > > lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..70fc44ac > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls > + */ > +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > + > +#include <gtest/gtest.h> > + > +#include "time_sheet.h" > + > +using namespace libcamera; > + > +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) > + : SimpleCapture(camera) > +{ > +} > + > +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) > +{ > + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); > + /* Ensure defined default values */ > + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); > + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); > + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > + > + if (controls) { > + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); > + } > + > + start(&ctrls); > + > + queueCount_ = 0; > + captureCount_ = 0; > + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; > + > + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); > + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; > + return timeSheet; > +} > + > +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) > +{ > + queueCount_++; > + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) > + return 0; > + > + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > + if (ts) { > + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); > + } > + > + return camera_->queueRequest(request); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) > +{ > + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > + if (ts) { > + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); > + } > + > + captureCount_++; > + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { > + loop_->exit(0); > + return; > + } > + > + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); > + if (queueRequest(request)) > + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() > +{ > + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); > + > + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ > + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { > + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); > + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); > + queueRequest(request.get()); > + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); > + } > + > + /* Run capture session. */ > + loop_ = new EventLoop(); > + loop_->exec(); > + stop(); > + delete loop_; > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + > + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > + //wait a few frames to settle > + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); > + ts.printAllInfos(); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); > + > + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > + /* > + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). > + * This should be investigated. > + */ > + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > + > + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > + > + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > + //wait a few frames to settle > + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > + > + /* No increase just before setting gain */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > + /* > + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation > + */ > + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > + > + /* No increase just after setting gain */ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() > +{ > + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > + > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); > + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); > + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > +} > + > +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() > +{ > + ControlList startValues; > + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > + > + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); > + > + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ > + > + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); > + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > + > + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > + > + runCaptureSession(); > + > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); > + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); > + > + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ > + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); > + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); > +} > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..e783f024 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls > + */ > + > +#pragma once > + > +#include <memory> > + > +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > + > +#include "../common/event_loop.h" > + > +#include "simple_capture.h" > +#include "time_sheet.h" > + > +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture > +{ > +public: > + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > + > + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > + void runCaptureSession(); > + > + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); > + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > + > + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; > + > + unsigned int queueCount_; > + unsigned int captureCount_; > + unsigned int captureLimit_; > + > + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; > +}; > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) > } > } > > -void SimpleCapture::start() > +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) > { > Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() > > camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); > > - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > } > > void SimpleCapture::stop() > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: > SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > virtual ~SimpleCapture(); > > - void start(); > + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > void stop(); > > virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..9a0e6544 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * time_sheet.cpp > + */ > +#include "time_sheet.h" > + > +#include <sstream> > +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > + > +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" > +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" > + > +using namespace libcamera; > + > +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) > +{ > + return (double)*data; > +} > + > +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) > +{ > + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); > +} > + > +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) > +{ > + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); > + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { > + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); > + if (in.isValid()) { > + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); > + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); > + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); > + > + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; > + int pixelStride; > + > + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { > + case formats::NV12: > + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; > + pixelStride = 1; > + break; > + case formats::SRGGB10: > + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; > + pixelStride = 2; > + break; > + default: > + std::stringstream s; > + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; > + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); > + } > + > + double sum = 0; > + int w = 20; > + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; > + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; > + > + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { > + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; > + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { > + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); > + } > + } > + sum = sum / (w * w); > + return sum; > + } > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) > + : controls_(idmap) > +{ > +} > + > +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) > +{ > + metadata_ = request->metadata(); > + > + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); > + if (previous) { > + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); > + } > + sequence_ = request->sequence(); > +} > + > +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() > +{ > + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; > + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; > + > + if (!metadata_.empty()) { > + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; > + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); > + assert(idMap); > + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { > + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; > + } > + } > +} > + > +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) > +{ > + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; > + if (!entry) > + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); > + return *entry; > +} > + > +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) > +{ > + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); > +} > + > +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) > +{ > + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); > + auto &entry = get(sequence); > + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; > + if (sequence >= 1) { > + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); > + } > + > + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); > +} > + > +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() > +{ > + for (auto entry : entries_) { > + if (entry) > + entry->printInfo(); > + } > +} > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..c155763c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > + * > + * time_sheet.h > + */ > + > +#pragma once > + > +#include <future> > +#include <vector> > + > +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > + > +class TimeSheetEntry > +{ > +public: > + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); > + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; > + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; > + > + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; > + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; > + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); > + void printInfo(); > + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; > + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; > + > +private: > + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; > + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; > + libcamera::ControlList controls_; > + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; > + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; > +}; > + > +class TimeSheet > +{ > +public: > + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) > + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; > + > + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); > + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > + void printAllInfos(); > + > + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; > + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); > + > +private: > + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; > + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; > +}; > -- > 2.40.1 >
Hi David, thanks for your comment. Am 01.03.24 um 08:56 schrieb David Plowman: > Hi Stefan > > Thanks for posting this and re-starting the discussion of per-frame controls. > > Could you perhaps just summarise exactly what you mean by per-frame > controls, that is to say, what is being tested here? > > Eye-balling the code, I think I understood that: > > * You are setting controls in a specific request. > * When that request completes, you are expecting the controls to have > taken effect in the images that were returned with that request (but > not earlier). > > But I wasn't totally sure - have I understood that correctly? > > Also, do we know if any other pipeline handlers implement this > behaviour? Do folks think that all pipeline handlers should implement > this behaviour? You are completely right. This needs a bit more context. It all started on my side with implementing metadata support in SimplePipeline handler. I soon hit some corner cases where I expected things to behave differently in cooperation with DelayedControls. So either I hit a bug in DelayedControls or I didn't fully understand the concept behind it. I ended up changing several things in DelayedControls which I believe where correct. The question then was how to prove correctness as all current users of DelayedControls where ISP implementations. There are some unittests, but the order of calls in these tests also felt counterintuitive (might well be, that it's just missing knowledge on my side). In that area there were also no tests in lc-compliance which tested the behaviour of an actual sensor/isp combination. So I started to write these tests with my personal expectation of how I believe things should work. These tests pass on my SimplePipeline. I also tried to massage the rkisp pipeline to pass these tests and hit some corners where work would be required. Before digging deeper into that I believe it makes sense to see if my expectations are correct and if a broader audience agrees to them. So here we are, that's the reason for the RFC. Now on to the technical details: Yes my expectation on per-frame-controls would be: If I queue something for frame x, I expect that the system tries to fullfill exacty that request (and never earlier). I'm well aware that this will not be possible in every case when an ISP is involved, so the ISP should do the best it can, but the metadata should reflect what was actually achieved. All the tests are currently for manual mode, so no regulation is involved (at least for the params I test). Do you agree with these assumptions? Looking forward to you opinion. Best regards, Stefan > > Thanks again! > David > > > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:01, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: >> >> These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at >> the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. >> >> This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by >> calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. >> >> Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch >> with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a >> current master :-) >> >> Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. >> Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in >> the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. >> Which is exactly what this test shall proove. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> >> --- >> src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + >> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- >> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- >> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ >> 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >> >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >> index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ >> #include <gtest/gtest.h> >> >> #include "environment.h" >> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" >> #include "simple_capture.h" >> >> using namespace libcamera; >> @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, >> testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), >> testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), >> SingleStream::nameParameters); >> + >> +/* >> + * Test Per frame controls >> + */ >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); >> +} >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >> index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >> @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ >> 'capture_test.cpp', >> 'environment.cpp', >> 'main.cpp', >> + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', >> 'simple_capture.cpp', >> + 'time_sheet.cpp', >> ]) >> >> lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..70fc44ac >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >> @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls >> + */ >> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" >> + >> +#include <gtest/gtest.h> >> + >> +#include "time_sheet.h" >> + >> +using namespace libcamera; >> + >> +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) >> + : SimpleCapture(camera) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) >> +{ >> + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); >> + /* Ensure defined default values */ >> + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); >> + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); >> + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >> + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >> + >> + if (controls) { >> + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); >> + } >> + >> + start(&ctrls); >> + >> + queueCount_ = 0; >> + captureCount_ = 0; >> + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; >> + >> + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); >> + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; >> + return timeSheet; >> +} >> + >> +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) >> +{ >> + queueCount_++; >> + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) >> + return 0; >> + >> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); >> + if (ts) { >> + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); >> + } >> + >> + return camera_->queueRequest(request); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) >> +{ >> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); >> + if (ts) { >> + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); >> + } >> + >> + captureCount_++; >> + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { >> + loop_->exit(0); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); >> + if (queueRequest(request)) >> + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() >> +{ >> + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); >> + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); >> + >> + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ >> + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { >> + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); >> + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); >> + queueRequest(request.get()); >> + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); >> + } >> + >> + /* Run capture session. */ >> + loop_ = new EventLoop(); >> + loop_->exec(); >> + stop(); >> + delete loop_; >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + >> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); >> + //wait a few frames to settle >> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); >> + ts.printAllInfos(); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); >> + >> + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; >> + /* >> + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). >> + * This should be investigated. >> + */ >> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " >> + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; >> + >> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >> + >> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >> + //wait a few frames to settle >> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >> + >> + /* No increase just before setting gain */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; >> + /* >> + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation >> + */ >> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " >> + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; >> + >> + /* No increase just after setting gain */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); >> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() >> +{ >> + ControlList startValues; >> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); >> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >> + >> + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); >> + >> + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ >> + >> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); >> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); >> + >> + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ >> + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); >> + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); >> +} >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..e783f024 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls >> + */ >> + >> +#pragma once >> + >> +#include <memory> >> + >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >> + >> +#include "../common/event_loop.h" >> + >> +#include "simple_capture.h" >> +#include "time_sheet.h" >> + >> +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture >> +{ >> +public: >> + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); >> + >> + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); >> + void runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); >> + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); >> + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); >> + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); >> + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); >> + >> + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); >> + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; >> + >> + unsigned int queueCount_; >> + unsigned int captureCount_; >> + unsigned int captureLimit_; >> + >> + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; >> +}; >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >> index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) >> } >> } >> >> -void SimpleCapture::start() >> +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) >> { >> Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); >> int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); >> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() >> >> camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); >> >> - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; >> + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; >> } >> >> void SimpleCapture::stop() >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >> index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: >> SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); >> virtual ~SimpleCapture(); >> >> - void start(); >> + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); >> void stop(); >> >> virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..9a0e6544 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * time_sheet.cpp >> + */ >> +#include "time_sheet.h" >> + >> +#include <sstream> >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >> + >> +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" >> +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" >> + >> +using namespace libcamera; >> + >> +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) >> +{ >> + return (double)*data; >> +} >> + >> +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) >> +{ >> + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); >> +} >> + >> +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) >> +{ >> + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); >> + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { >> + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); >> + if (in.isValid()) { >> + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); >> + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); >> + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); >> + >> + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; >> + int pixelStride; >> + >> + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { >> + case formats::NV12: >> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; >> + pixelStride = 1; >> + break; >> + case formats::SRGGB10: >> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; >> + pixelStride = 2; >> + break; >> + default: >> + std::stringstream s; >> + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; >> + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); >> + } >> + >> + double sum = 0; >> + int w = 20; >> + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; >> + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; >> + >> + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { >> + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; >> + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { >> + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); >> + } >> + } >> + sum = sum / (w * w); >> + return sum; >> + } >> + } >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) >> + : controls_(idmap) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) >> +{ >> + metadata_ = request->metadata(); >> + >> + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); >> + if (previous) { >> + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); >> + } >> + sequence_ = request->sequence(); >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() >> +{ >> + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; >> + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; >> + >> + if (!metadata_.empty()) { >> + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; >> + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); >> + assert(idMap); >> + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { >> + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; >> + } >> + } >> +} >> + >> +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) >> +{ >> + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; >> + if (!entry) >> + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); >> + return *entry; >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) >> +{ >> + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) >> +{ >> + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); >> + auto &entry = get(sequence); >> + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; >> + if (sequence >= 1) { >> + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); >> + } >> + >> + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() >> +{ >> + for (auto entry : entries_) { >> + if (entry) >> + entry->printInfo(); >> + } >> +} >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..c155763c >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * time_sheet.h >> + */ >> + >> +#pragma once >> + >> +#include <future> >> +#include <vector> >> + >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >> + >> +class TimeSheetEntry >> +{ >> +public: >> + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); >> + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; >> + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; >> + >> + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; >> + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; >> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); >> + void printInfo(); >> + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; >> + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; >> + >> +private: >> + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; >> + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; >> + libcamera::ControlList controls_; >> + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; >> + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; >> +}; >> + >> +class TimeSheet >> +{ >> +public: >> + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) >> + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; >> + >> + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); >> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); >> + void printAllInfos(); >> + >> + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; >> + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); >> + >> +private: >> + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; >> + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; >> +}; >> -- >> 2.40.1 >>
Hi David, thanks for your comment. This is the same message I sent before, but with proper linewrapping - sorry about that. Am 01.03.24 um 08:56 schrieb David Plowman: > Hi Stefan > > Thanks for posting this and re-starting the discussion of per-frame controls. > > Could you perhaps just summarise exactly what you mean by per-frame > controls, that is to say, what is being tested here? > > Eye-balling the code, I think I understood that: > > * You are setting controls in a specific request. > * When that request completes, you are expecting the controls to have > taken effect in the images that were returned with that request (but > not earlier). > > But I wasn't totally sure - have I understood that correctly? > > Also, do we know if any other pipeline handlers implement this > behaviour? Do folks think that all pipeline handlers should implement > this behaviour? > > Thanks again! > David > You are completely right. This needs a bit more context. It all started on my side with implementing metadata support in SimplePipeline handler. I soon hit some corner cases where I expected things to behave differently in cooperation with DelayedControls. So either I hit a bug in DelayedControls or I didn't fully understand the concept behind it. I ended up changing several things in DelayedControls which I believe where correct. The question then was how to prove correctness as all current users of DelayedControls where ISP implementations. There are some unittests, but the order of calls in these tests also felt counterintuitive (might well be, that it's just missing knowledge on my side). In that area there were also no tests in lc-compliance which tested the behaviour of an actual sensor/isp combination. So I started to write these tests with my personal expectation of how I believe things should work. These tests pass on my SimplePipeline. I also tried to massage the rkisp pipeline to pass these tests and hit some corners where work would be required. Before digging deeper into that I believe it makes sense to see if my expectations are correct and if a broader audience agrees to them. So here we are, that's the reason for the RFC. Now on to the technical details: Yes my expectation on per-frame-controls would be: If I queue something for frame x, I expect that the system tries to fullfill exacty that request (and never earlier). I'm well aware that this will not be possible in every case when an ISP is involved, so the ISP should do the best it can, but the metadata should reflect what was actually achieved. All the tests are currently for manual mode, so no regulation is involved (at least for the params I test). Do you agree with these assumptions? Looking forward to your opinion. Best regards, Stefan > > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:01, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: >> >> These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at >> the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. >> >> This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by >> calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. >> >> Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch >> with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a >> current master :-) >> >> Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. >> Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in >> the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. >> Which is exactly what this test shall proove. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> >> --- >> src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + >> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- >> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- >> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ >> 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >> >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >> index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ >> #include <gtest/gtest.h> >> >> #include "environment.h" >> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" >> #include "simple_capture.h" >> >> using namespace libcamera; >> @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, >> testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), >> testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), >> SingleStream::nameParameters); >> + >> +/* >> + * Test Per frame controls >> + */ >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); >> +} >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >> index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >> @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ >> 'capture_test.cpp', >> 'environment.cpp', >> 'main.cpp', >> + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', >> 'simple_capture.cpp', >> + 'time_sheet.cpp', >> ]) >> >> lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..70fc44ac >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >> @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls >> + */ >> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" >> + >> +#include <gtest/gtest.h> >> + >> +#include "time_sheet.h" >> + >> +using namespace libcamera; >> + >> +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) >> + : SimpleCapture(camera) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) >> +{ >> + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); >> + /* Ensure defined default values */ >> + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); >> + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); >> + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >> + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >> + >> + if (controls) { >> + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); >> + } >> + >> + start(&ctrls); >> + >> + queueCount_ = 0; >> + captureCount_ = 0; >> + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; >> + >> + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); >> + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; >> + return timeSheet; >> +} >> + >> +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) >> +{ >> + queueCount_++; >> + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) >> + return 0; >> + >> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); >> + if (ts) { >> + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); >> + } >> + >> + return camera_->queueRequest(request); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) >> +{ >> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); >> + if (ts) { >> + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); >> + } >> + >> + captureCount_++; >> + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { >> + loop_->exit(0); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); >> + if (queueRequest(request)) >> + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() >> +{ >> + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); >> + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); >> + >> + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ >> + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { >> + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); >> + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); >> + queueRequest(request.get()); >> + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); >> + } >> + >> + /* Run capture session. */ >> + loop_ = new EventLoop(); >> + loop_->exec(); >> + stop(); >> + delete loop_; >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + >> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); >> + //wait a few frames to settle >> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); >> + ts.printAllInfos(); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); >> + >> + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; >> + /* >> + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). >> + * This should be investigated. >> + */ >> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " >> + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; >> + >> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >> + >> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >> + //wait a few frames to settle >> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >> + >> + /* No increase just before setting gain */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; >> + /* >> + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation >> + */ >> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " >> + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; >> + >> + /* No increase just after setting gain */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); >> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() >> +{ >> + ControlList startValues; >> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); >> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >> + >> + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); >> + >> + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ >> + >> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); >> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); >> + >> + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ >> + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); >> + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); >> +} >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..e783f024 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls >> + */ >> + >> +#pragma once >> + >> +#include <memory> >> + >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >> + >> +#include "../common/event_loop.h" >> + >> +#include "simple_capture.h" >> +#include "time_sheet.h" >> + >> +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture >> +{ >> +public: >> + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); >> + >> + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); >> + void runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); >> + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); >> + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); >> + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); >> + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); >> + >> + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); >> + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; >> + >> + unsigned int queueCount_; >> + unsigned int captureCount_; >> + unsigned int captureLimit_; >> + >> + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; >> +}; >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >> index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) >> } >> } >> >> -void SimpleCapture::start() >> +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) >> { >> Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); >> int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); >> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() >> >> camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); >> >> - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; >> + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; >> } >> >> void SimpleCapture::stop() >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >> index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: >> SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); >> virtual ~SimpleCapture(); >> >> - void start(); >> + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); >> void stop(); >> >> virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..9a0e6544 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * time_sheet.cpp >> + */ >> +#include "time_sheet.h" >> + >> +#include <sstream> >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >> + >> +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" >> +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" >> + >> +using namespace libcamera; >> + >> +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) >> +{ >> + return (double)*data; >> +} >> + >> +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) >> +{ >> + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); >> +} >> + >> +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) >> +{ >> + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); >> + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { >> + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); >> + if (in.isValid()) { >> + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); >> + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); >> + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); >> + >> + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; >> + int pixelStride; >> + >> + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { >> + case formats::NV12: >> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; >> + pixelStride = 1; >> + break; >> + case formats::SRGGB10: >> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; >> + pixelStride = 2; >> + break; >> + default: >> + std::stringstream s; >> + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; >> + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); >> + } >> + >> + double sum = 0; >> + int w = 20; >> + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; >> + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; >> + >> + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { >> + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; >> + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { >> + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); >> + } >> + } >> + sum = sum / (w * w); >> + return sum; >> + } >> + } >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) >> + : controls_(idmap) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) >> +{ >> + metadata_ = request->metadata(); >> + >> + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); >> + if (previous) { >> + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); >> + } >> + sequence_ = request->sequence(); >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() >> +{ >> + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; >> + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; >> + >> + if (!metadata_.empty()) { >> + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; >> + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); >> + assert(idMap); >> + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { >> + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; >> + } >> + } >> +} >> + >> +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) >> +{ >> + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; >> + if (!entry) >> + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); >> + return *entry; >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) >> +{ >> + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) >> +{ >> + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); >> + auto &entry = get(sequence); >> + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; >> + if (sequence >= 1) { >> + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); >> + } >> + >> + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() >> +{ >> + for (auto entry : entries_) { >> + if (entry) >> + entry->printInfo(); >> + } >> +} >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..c155763c >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * time_sheet.h >> + */ >> + >> +#pragma once >> + >> +#include <future> >> +#include <vector> >> + >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >> + >> +class TimeSheetEntry >> +{ >> +public: >> + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); >> + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; >> + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; >> + >> + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; >> + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; >> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); >> + void printInfo(); >> + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; >> + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; >> + >> +private: >> + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; >> + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; >> + libcamera::ControlList controls_; >> + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; >> + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; >> +}; >> + >> +class TimeSheet >> +{ >> +public: >> + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) >> + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; >> + >> + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); >> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); >> + void printAllInfos(); >> + >> + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; >> + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); >> + >> +private: >> + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; >> + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; >> +}; >> -- >> 2.40.1 >>
Hi Stefan On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 11:22, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > Hi David, > > thanks for your comment. This is the same message I sent before, but with proper > linewrapping - sorry about that. > > Am 01.03.24 um 08:56 schrieb David Plowman: > > Hi Stefan > > > > Thanks for posting this and re-starting the discussion of per-frame controls. > > > > Could you perhaps just summarise exactly what you mean by per-frame > > controls, that is to say, what is being tested here? > > > > Eye-balling the code, I think I understood that: > > > > * You are setting controls in a specific request. > > * When that request completes, you are expecting the controls to have > > taken effect in the images that were returned with that request (but > > not earlier). > > > > But I wasn't totally sure - have I understood that correctly? > > > > Also, do we know if any other pipeline handlers implement this > > behaviour? Do folks think that all pipeline handlers should implement > > this behaviour? > > > > Thanks again! > > David > > > You are completely right. This needs a bit more context. > > It all started on my side with implementing metadata support in SimplePipeline > handler. I soon hit some corner cases where I expected things to behave > differently in cooperation with DelayedControls. So either I hit a bug in > DelayedControls or I didn't fully understand the concept behind it. > > I ended up changing several things in DelayedControls which I believe where > correct. The question then was how to prove correctness as all current users of > DelayedControls where ISP implementations. There are some unittests, but the > order of calls in these tests also felt counterintuitive (might well be, that > it's just missing knowledge on my side). > > In that area there were also no tests in lc-compliance which tested the > behaviour of an actual sensor/isp combination. So I started to write these tests > with my personal expectation of how I believe things should work. These tests > pass on my SimplePipeline. I also tried to massage the rkisp pipeline to pass > these tests and hit some corners where work would be required. > > Before digging deeper into that I believe it makes sense to see if my > expectations are correct and if a broader audience agrees to them. So here we > are, that's the reason for the RFC. > > Now on to the technical details: > Yes my expectation on per-frame-controls would be: If I queue something for > frame x, I expect that the system tries to fullfill exacty that request (and > never earlier). I'm well aware that this will not be possible in every case when > an ISP is involved, so the ISP should do the best it can, but the metadata > should reflect what was actually achieved. All the tests are currently for > manual mode, so no regulation is involved (at least for the params I test). > > Do you agree with these assumptions? Looking forward to your opinion. Thanks for the clarification, and glad that I've understood! A bit of context from our side... We looked at and implemented a per-frame controls solution for the Raspberry Pi back in summer 2022. I would say there were a couple of differences: 1. We included a mechanism for reporting failure cases. The only real failure case we have is failing to update camera exposure/gain settings in time because there is quite a short window in which to service the camera frame interrupts (especially when the system is busy and the framerate is fast). The mechanism allowed the application to check whether controls had been applied as expected, or whether they'd been delayed to the next frame. It told you whether they'd got "merged" with the next set of controls, or whether all the controls are now running "a frame late". 2. We implemented our scheme in the same way as you've described, where the request where you set the controls has the first images that fulfill the request. We called this "Android mode" though tbh I'm not sure whether or not this really is what Android does!!! Although in the end we decided we didn't like this behaviour so much because controls get delayed to the back of all the requests that have been queued (and we normally queue quite a lot so as to avoid the risk of frame drops). So we also added "Raspberry Pi mode" where controls are applied earlier. In principle I would be happy to let the Pi run in either mode ("Android" or "Pi"), so long as we can choose "Pi mode" for our applications. In both cases the same reporting mechanism told the application exactly when the controls had been applied, so that applications could be "mode" agnostic. Since Summer 2022, per-frame controls have not really progressed so far as I know. We are intending to resurrect our per-frame controls implementation again once we've got over the Pi 5 libcamera integration, so I'm very happy to be resuming this discussion. Thanks! David > > Best regards, > Stefan > > > > > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:01, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > >> > >> These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at > >> the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. > >> > >> This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by > >> calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. > >> > >> Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch > >> with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a > >> current master :-) > >> > >> Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. > >> Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in > >> the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. > >> Which is exactly what this test shall proove. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> > >> --- > >> src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ > >> src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + > >> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ > >> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ > >> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- > >> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- > >> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ > >> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ > >> 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > >> > >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > >> index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 > >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > >> #include <gtest/gtest.h> > >> > >> #include "environment.h" > >> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > >> #include "simple_capture.h" > >> > >> using namespace libcamera; > >> @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, > >> testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), > >> testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), > >> SingleStream::nameParameters); > >> + > >> +/* > >> + * Test Per frame controls > >> + */ > >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) > >> +{ > >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > >> + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > >> +} > >> + > >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) > >> +{ > >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > >> + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); > >> +} > >> + > >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) > >> +{ > >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > >> + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > >> +} > >> + > >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) > >> +{ > >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > >> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > >> +} > >> + > >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) > >> +{ > >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > >> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > >> +} > >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > >> index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 > >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > >> @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ > >> 'capture_test.cpp', > >> 'environment.cpp', > >> 'main.cpp', > >> + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', > >> 'simple_capture.cpp', > >> + 'time_sheet.cpp', > >> ]) > >> > >> lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, > >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 00000000..70fc44ac > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > >> @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ > >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > >> +/* > >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > >> + * > >> + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls > >> + */ > >> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > >> + > >> +#include <gtest/gtest.h> > >> + > >> +#include "time_sheet.h" > >> + > >> +using namespace libcamera; > >> + > >> +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) > >> + : SimpleCapture(camera) > >> +{ > >> +} > >> + > >> +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) > >> +{ > >> + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); > >> + /* Ensure defined default values */ > >> + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); > >> + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); > >> + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > >> + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > >> + > >> + if (controls) { > >> + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); > >> + } > >> + > >> + start(&ctrls); > >> + > >> + queueCount_ = 0; > >> + captureCount_ = 0; > >> + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; > >> + > >> + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); > >> + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; > >> + return timeSheet; > >> +} > >> + > >> +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) > >> +{ > >> + queueCount_++; > >> + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) > >> + return 0; > >> + > >> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > >> + if (ts) { > >> + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); > >> + } > >> + > >> + return camera_->queueRequest(request); > >> +} > >> + > >> +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) > >> +{ > >> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > >> + if (ts) { > >> + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); > >> + } > >> + > >> + captureCount_++; > >> + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { > >> + loop_->exit(0); > >> + return; > >> + } > >> + > >> + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); > >> + if (queueRequest(request)) > >> + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); > >> +} > >> + > >> +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() > >> +{ > >> + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > >> + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); > >> + > >> + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ > >> + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { > >> + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); > >> + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); > >> + queueRequest(request.get()); > >> + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); > >> + } > >> + > >> + /* Run capture session. */ > >> + loop_ = new EventLoop(); > >> + loop_->exec(); > >> + stop(); > >> + delete loop_; > >> +} > >> + > >> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() > >> +{ > >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > >> + > >> + > >> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > >> + //wait a few frames to settle > >> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); > >> + ts.printAllInfos(); > >> + > >> + runCaptureSession(); > >> + > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); > >> + > >> + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > >> + /* > >> + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). > >> + * This should be investigated. > >> + */ > >> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > >> + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > >> + > >> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > >> + > >> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > >> +} > >> + > >> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() > >> +{ > >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > >> + > >> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > >> + //wait a few frames to settle > >> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > >> + > >> + runCaptureSession(); > >> + > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > >> + > >> + /* No increase just before setting gain */ > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > >> + /* > >> + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation > >> + */ > >> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > >> + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > >> + > >> + /* No increase just after setting gain */ > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > >> +} > >> + > >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() > >> +{ > >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > >> + > >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > >> + > >> + runCaptureSession(); > >> + > >> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > >> +} > >> + > >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() > >> +{ > >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > >> + > >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); > >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); > >> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > >> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > >> + > >> + runCaptureSession(); > >> + > >> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > >> +} > >> + > >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() > >> +{ > >> + ControlList startValues; > >> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > >> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > >> + > >> + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > >> + > >> + runCaptureSession(); > >> + > >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); > >> + > >> + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ > >> + > >> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); > >> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > >> + > >> + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > >> + > >> + runCaptureSession(); > >> + > >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); > >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); > >> + > >> + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ > >> + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); > >> + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); > >> +} > >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 00000000..e783f024 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > >> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > >> +/* > >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > >> + * > >> + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls > >> + */ > >> + > >> +#pragma once > >> + > >> +#include <memory> > >> + > >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > >> + > >> +#include "../common/event_loop.h" > >> + > >> +#include "simple_capture.h" > >> +#include "time_sheet.h" > >> + > >> +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture > >> +{ > >> +public: > >> + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > >> + > >> + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > >> + void runCaptureSession(); > >> + > >> + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > >> + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); > >> + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > >> + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > >> + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > >> + > >> + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > >> + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; > >> + > >> + unsigned int queueCount_; > >> + unsigned int captureCount_; > >> + unsigned int captureLimit_; > >> + > >> + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; > >> +}; > >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > >> index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 > >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) > >> } > >> } > >> > >> -void SimpleCapture::start() > >> +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) > >> { > >> Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > >> int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); > >> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() > >> > >> camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); > >> > >> - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > >> + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > >> } > >> > >> void SimpleCapture::stop() > >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > >> index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 > >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > >> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: > >> SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > >> virtual ~SimpleCapture(); > >> > >> - void start(); > >> + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > >> void stop(); > >> > >> virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; > >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 00000000..9a0e6544 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > >> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ > >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > >> +/* > >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > >> + * > >> + * time_sheet.cpp > >> + */ > >> +#include "time_sheet.h" > >> + > >> +#include <sstream> > >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > >> + > >> +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" > >> +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" > >> + > >> +using namespace libcamera; > >> + > >> +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) > >> +{ > >> + return (double)*data; > >> +} > >> + > >> +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) > >> +{ > >> + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); > >> +} > >> + > >> +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) > >> +{ > >> + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); > >> + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { > >> + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); > >> + if (in.isValid()) { > >> + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); > >> + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); > >> + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); > >> + > >> + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; > >> + int pixelStride; > >> + > >> + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { > >> + case formats::NV12: > >> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; > >> + pixelStride = 1; > >> + break; > >> + case formats::SRGGB10: > >> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; > >> + pixelStride = 2; > >> + break; > >> + default: > >> + std::stringstream s; > >> + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; > >> + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); > >> + } > >> + > >> + double sum = 0; > >> + int w = 20; > >> + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; > >> + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; > >> + > >> + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { > >> + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; > >> + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { > >> + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); > >> + } > >> + } > >> + sum = sum / (w * w); > >> + return sum; > >> + } > >> + } > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) > >> + : controls_(idmap) > >> +{ > >> +} > >> + > >> +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) > >> +{ > >> + metadata_ = request->metadata(); > >> + > >> + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); > >> + if (previous) { > >> + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); > >> + } > >> + sequence_ = request->sequence(); > >> +} > >> + > >> +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() > >> +{ > >> + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; > >> + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; > >> + > >> + if (!metadata_.empty()) { > >> + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; > >> + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); > >> + assert(idMap); > >> + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { > >> + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; > >> + } > >> + } > >> +} > >> + > >> +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) > >> +{ > >> + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; > >> + if (!entry) > >> + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); > >> + return *entry; > >> +} > >> + > >> +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) > >> +{ > >> + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); > >> +} > >> + > >> +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) > >> +{ > >> + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); > >> + auto &entry = get(sequence); > >> + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; > >> + if (sequence >= 1) { > >> + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); > >> + } > >> + > >> + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); > >> +} > >> + > >> +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() > >> +{ > >> + for (auto entry : entries_) { > >> + if (entry) > >> + entry->printInfo(); > >> + } > >> +} > >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 00000000..c155763c > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > >> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ > >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > >> +/* > >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > >> + * > >> + * time_sheet.h > >> + */ > >> + > >> +#pragma once > >> + > >> +#include <future> > >> +#include <vector> > >> + > >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > >> + > >> +class TimeSheetEntry > >> +{ > >> +public: > >> + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); > >> + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; > >> + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; > >> + > >> + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; > >> + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; > >> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); > >> + void printInfo(); > >> + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; > >> + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; > >> + > >> +private: > >> + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; > >> + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; > >> + libcamera::ControlList controls_; > >> + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; > >> + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; > >> +}; > >> + > >> +class TimeSheet > >> +{ > >> +public: > >> + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) > >> + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; > >> + > >> + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); > >> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > >> + void printAllInfos(); > >> + > >> + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; > >> + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); > >> + > >> +private: > >> + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; > >> + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; > >> +}; > >> -- > >> 2.40.1 > >> > > -- > Regards, > > Stefan Klug >
Hi David, Am 01.03.24 um 13:04 schrieb David Plowman: > Hi Stefan > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 11:22, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: >> >> Hi David, >> >> thanks for your comment. This is the same message I sent before, but with proper >> linewrapping - sorry about that. >> >> Am 01.03.24 um 08:56 schrieb David Plowman: >>> Hi Stefan >>> >>> Thanks for posting this and re-starting the discussion of per-frame controls. >>> >>> Could you perhaps just summarise exactly what you mean by per-frame >>> controls, that is to say, what is being tested here? >>> >>> Eye-balling the code, I think I understood that: >>> >>> * You are setting controls in a specific request. >>> * When that request completes, you are expecting the controls to have >>> taken effect in the images that were returned with that request (but >>> not earlier). >>> >>> But I wasn't totally sure - have I understood that correctly? >>> >>> Also, do we know if any other pipeline handlers implement this >>> behaviour? Do folks think that all pipeline handlers should implement >>> this behaviour? >>> >>> Thanks again! >>> David >>> >> You are completely right. This needs a bit more context. >> >> It all started on my side with implementing metadata support in SimplePipeline >> handler. I soon hit some corner cases where I expected things to behave >> differently in cooperation with DelayedControls. So either I hit a bug in >> DelayedControls or I didn't fully understand the concept behind it. >> >> I ended up changing several things in DelayedControls which I believe where >> correct. The question then was how to prove correctness as all current users of >> DelayedControls where ISP implementations. There are some unittests, but the >> order of calls in these tests also felt counterintuitive (might well be, that >> it's just missing knowledge on my side). >> >> In that area there were also no tests in lc-compliance which tested the >> behaviour of an actual sensor/isp combination. So I started to write these tests >> with my personal expectation of how I believe things should work. These tests >> pass on my SimplePipeline. I also tried to massage the rkisp pipeline to pass >> these tests and hit some corners where work would be required. >> >> Before digging deeper into that I believe it makes sense to see if my >> expectations are correct and if a broader audience agrees to them. So here we >> are, that's the reason for the RFC. >> >> Now on to the technical details: >> Yes my expectation on per-frame-controls would be: If I queue something for >> frame x, I expect that the system tries to fullfill exacty that request (and >> never earlier). I'm well aware that this will not be possible in every case when >> an ISP is involved, so the ISP should do the best it can, but the metadata >> should reflect what was actually achieved. All the tests are currently for >> manual mode, so no regulation is involved (at least for the params I test). >> >> Do you agree with these assumptions? Looking forward to your opinion. > > Thanks for the clarification, and glad that I've understood! > > A bit of context from our side... We looked at and implemented a > per-frame controls solution for the Raspberry Pi back in summer 2022. > I would say there were a couple of differences: > > 1. We included a mechanism for reporting failure cases. The only real > failure case we have is failing to update camera exposure/gain > settings in time because there is quite a short window in which to > service the camera frame interrupts (especially when the system is > busy and the framerate is fast). That's interesting. Could you explain the mechanics you used for that feedback or point me to a patchset? Would be interesting to see which failure cases you modelled. How did you test these? > > The mechanism allowed the application to check whether controls had > been applied as expected, or whether they'd been delayed to the next > frame. It told you whether they'd got "merged" with the next set of > controls, or whether all the controls are now running "a frame late". > > 2. We implemented our scheme in the same way as you've described, > where the request where you set the controls has the first images that > fulfill the request. We called this "Android mode" though tbh I'm not > sure whether or not this really is what Android does!!! > > Although in the end we decided we didn't like this behaviour so much > because controls get delayed to the back of all the requests that have > been queued (and we normally queue quite a lot so as to avoid the risk Why was it necessary to move them to the back of all request? I guess in a typical usecase most requests would not contain controls (at least not from user side). So there would be a way to apply them as early in the queue as possible. I guess I'm missing somethimng here. > of frame drops). So we also added "Raspberry Pi mode" where controls > are applied earlier. > > In principle I would be happy to let the Pi run in either mode > ("Android" or "Pi"), so long as we can choose "Pi mode" for our > applications. In both cases the same reporting mechanism told the > application exactly when the controls had been applied, so that > applications could be "mode" agnostic. > > Since Summer 2022, per-frame controls have not really progressed so > far as I know. We are intending to resurrect our per-frame controls > implementation again once we've got over the Pi 5 libcamera > integration, so I'm very happy to be resuming this discussion. Sure. Would be great if we could come up with a set of tests that wee all agree on. Cheers, Stefan > > Thanks! > David > >> >> Best regards, >> Stefan >> >>> >>> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:01, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at >>>> the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. >>>> >>>> This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by >>>> calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. >>>> >>>> Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch >>>> with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a >>>> current master :-) >>>> >>>> Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. >>>> Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in >>>> the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. >>>> Which is exactly what this test shall proove. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> >>>> --- >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ >>>> 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >>>> >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >>>> index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ >>>> #include <gtest/gtest.h> >>>> >>>> #include "environment.h" >>>> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" >>>> #include "simple_capture.h" >>>> >>>> using namespace libcamera; >>>> @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, >>>> testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), >>>> testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), >>>> SingleStream::nameParameters); >>>> + >>>> +/* >>>> + * Test Per frame controls >>>> + */ >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) >>>> +{ >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >>>> + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) >>>> +{ >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >>>> + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) >>>> +{ >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >>>> + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) >>>> +{ >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >>>> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) >>>> +{ >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >>>> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); >>>> +} >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >>>> index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >>>> @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ >>>> 'capture_test.cpp', >>>> 'environment.cpp', >>>> 'main.cpp', >>>> + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', >>>> 'simple_capture.cpp', >>>> + 'time_sheet.cpp', >>>> ]) >>>> >>>> lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 00000000..70fc44ac >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >>>> +/* >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >>>> + * >>>> + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls >>>> + */ >>>> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" >>>> + >>>> +#include <gtest/gtest.h> >>>> + >>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" >>>> + >>>> +using namespace libcamera; >>>> + >>>> +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) >>>> + : SimpleCapture(camera) >>>> +{ >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) >>>> +{ >>>> + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); >>>> + /* Ensure defined default values */ >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >>>> + >>>> + if (controls) { >>>> + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + start(&ctrls); >>>> + >>>> + queueCount_ = 0; >>>> + captureCount_ = 0; >>>> + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; >>>> + >>>> + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); >>>> + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; >>>> + return timeSheet; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) >>>> +{ >>>> + queueCount_++; >>>> + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) >>>> + return 0; >>>> + >>>> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); >>>> + if (ts) { >>>> + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + return camera_->queueRequest(request); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) >>>> +{ >>>> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); >>>> + if (ts) { >>>> + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + captureCount_++; >>>> + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { >>>> + loop_->exit(0); >>>> + return; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); >>>> + if (queueRequest(request)) >>>> + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() >>>> +{ >>>> + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); >>>> + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); >>>> + >>>> + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ >>>> + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { >>>> + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); >>>> + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); >>>> + queueRequest(request.get()); >>>> + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + /* Run capture session. */ >>>> + loop_ = new EventLoop(); >>>> + loop_->exec(); >>>> + stop(); >>>> + delete loop_; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() >>>> +{ >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >>>> + >>>> + >>>> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); >>>> + //wait a few frames to settle >>>> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); >>>> + ts.printAllInfos(); >>>> + >>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>> + >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); >>>> + >>>> + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; >>>> + /* >>>> + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). >>>> + * This should be investigated. >>>> + */ >>>> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " >>>> + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; >>>> + >>>> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >>>> + >>>> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() >>>> +{ >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >>>> + >>>> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >>>> + //wait a few frames to settle >>>> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >>>> + >>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>> + >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >>>> + >>>> + /* No increase just before setting gain */ >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; >>>> + /* >>>> + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation >>>> + */ >>>> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " >>>> + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; >>>> + >>>> + /* No increase just after setting gain */ >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() >>>> +{ >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >>>> + >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >>>> + >>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>> + >>>> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() >>>> +{ >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >>>> + >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); >>>> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >>>> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >>>> + >>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>> + >>>> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() >>>> +{ >>>> + ControlList startValues; >>>> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); >>>> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >>>> + >>>> + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); >>>> + >>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>> + >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); >>>> + >>>> + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ >>>> + >>>> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); >>>> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >>>> + >>>> + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); >>>> + >>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>> + >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); >>>> + >>>> + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ >>>> + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); >>>> + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); >>>> +} >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 00000000..e783f024 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >>>> +/* >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >>>> + * >>>> + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls >>>> + */ >>>> + >>>> +#pragma once >>>> + >>>> +#include <memory> >>>> + >>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >>>> + >>>> +#include "../common/event_loop.h" >>>> + >>>> +#include "simple_capture.h" >>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" >>>> + >>>> +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture >>>> +{ >>>> +public: >>>> + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); >>>> + >>>> + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); >>>> + void runCaptureSession(); >>>> + >>>> + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); >>>> + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); >>>> + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); >>>> + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); >>>> + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); >>>> + >>>> + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); >>>> + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; >>>> + >>>> + unsigned int queueCount_; >>>> + unsigned int captureCount_; >>>> + unsigned int captureLimit_; >>>> + >>>> + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; >>>> +}; >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >>>> index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >>>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) >>>> } >>>> } >>>> >>>> -void SimpleCapture::start() >>>> +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) >>>> { >>>> Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); >>>> int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); >>>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() >>>> >>>> camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); >>>> >>>> - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; >>>> + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; >>>> } >>>> >>>> void SimpleCapture::stop() >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >>>> index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: >>>> SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); >>>> virtual ~SimpleCapture(); >>>> >>>> - void start(); >>>> + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); >>>> void stop(); >>>> >>>> virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 00000000..9a0e6544 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ >>>> +/* >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >>>> + * >>>> + * time_sheet.cpp >>>> + */ >>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" >>>> + >>>> +#include <sstream> >>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >>>> + >>>> +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" >>>> +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" >>>> + >>>> +using namespace libcamera; >>>> + >>>> +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) >>>> +{ >>>> + return (double)*data; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) >>>> +{ >>>> + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) >>>> +{ >>>> + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); >>>> + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { >>>> + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); >>>> + if (in.isValid()) { >>>> + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); >>>> + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); >>>> + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); >>>> + >>>> + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; >>>> + int pixelStride; >>>> + >>>> + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { >>>> + case formats::NV12: >>>> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; >>>> + pixelStride = 1; >>>> + break; >>>> + case formats::SRGGB10: >>>> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; >>>> + pixelStride = 2; >>>> + break; >>>> + default: >>>> + std::stringstream s; >>>> + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; >>>> + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + double sum = 0; >>>> + int w = 20; >>>> + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; >>>> + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; >>>> + >>>> + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { >>>> + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; >>>> + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { >>>> + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); >>>> + } >>>> + } >>>> + sum = sum / (w * w); >>>> + return sum; >>>> + } >>>> + } >>>> + return 0; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) >>>> + : controls_(idmap) >>>> +{ >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) >>>> +{ >>>> + metadata_ = request->metadata(); >>>> + >>>> + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); >>>> + if (previous) { >>>> + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); >>>> + } >>>> + sequence_ = request->sequence(); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() >>>> +{ >>>> + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; >>>> + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; >>>> + >>>> + if (!metadata_.empty()) { >>>> + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; >>>> + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); >>>> + assert(idMap); >>>> + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { >>>> + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; >>>> + } >>>> + } >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) >>>> +{ >>>> + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; >>>> + if (!entry) >>>> + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); >>>> + return *entry; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) >>>> +{ >>>> + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) >>>> +{ >>>> + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); >>>> + auto &entry = get(sequence); >>>> + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; >>>> + if (sequence >= 1) { >>>> + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() >>>> +{ >>>> + for (auto entry : entries_) { >>>> + if (entry) >>>> + entry->printInfo(); >>>> + } >>>> +} >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 00000000..c155763c >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ >>>> +/* >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >>>> + * >>>> + * time_sheet.h >>>> + */ >>>> + >>>> +#pragma once >>>> + >>>> +#include <future> >>>> +#include <vector> >>>> + >>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >>>> + >>>> +class TimeSheetEntry >>>> +{ >>>> +public: >>>> + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); >>>> + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; >>>> + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; >>>> + >>>> + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; >>>> + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; >>>> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); >>>> + void printInfo(); >>>> + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; >>>> + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; >>>> + >>>> +private: >>>> + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; >>>> + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; >>>> + libcamera::ControlList controls_; >>>> + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; >>>> + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> +class TimeSheet >>>> +{ >>>> +public: >>>> + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) >>>> + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; >>>> + >>>> + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); >>>> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); >>>> + void printAllInfos(); >>>> + >>>> + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; >>>> + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); >>>> + >>>> +private: >>>> + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; >>>> + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; >>>> +}; >>>> -- >>>> 2.40.1 >>>> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Stefan Klug >>
Hi Kieran, thanks for you review. I will fix the commit/style issues in the first patchset. For now I was more focused on starting a dicussion on the overall idea. Am 29.02.24 um 18:36 schrieb Kieran Bingham: > Hi Stefan, > > Some quick review notes. > > I'm happy to see a test that actually tries to validate the > DelayedControls implementations, and considers the real effects on the > sensor. > > We try to break patches down to single topic commits, so here I can see > at least > - The introduction of the TimeSheet helper class > - Fix the SimpleCapture::start() to accept a control list > - Add per-frame-control tests> > Quoting Stefan Klug (2024-02-29 17:01:15) >> These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at >> the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. >> >> This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by >> calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. >> >> Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch >> with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a >> current master :-) > > I love good theories! ;-) I'm curious to see what happens on master and > other platforms. > > >> Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. >> Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in >> the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. >> Which is exactly what this test shall proove. > > 'prove' ;-) > >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> >> --- >> src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + >> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- >> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- >> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ >> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ >> 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >> >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >> index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ >> #include <gtest/gtest.h> >> >> #include "environment.h" >> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" >> #include "simple_capture.h" >> >> using namespace libcamera; >> @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, >> testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), >> testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), >> SingleStream::nameParameters); >> + >> +/* >> + * Test Per frame controls >> + */ >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); >> +} >> + >> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) >> +{ >> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); >> +} >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >> index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >> @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ >> 'capture_test.cpp', >> 'environment.cpp', >> 'main.cpp', >> + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', >> 'simple_capture.cpp', >> + 'time_sheet.cpp', >> ]) >> >> lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..70fc44ac >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >> @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls >> + */ >> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" >> + >> +#include <gtest/gtest.h> >> + >> +#include "time_sheet.h" >> + >> +using namespace libcamera; >> + >> +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) >> + : SimpleCapture(camera) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) >> +{ >> + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); >> + /* Ensure defined default values */ >> + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); >> + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); >> + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >> + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >> + >> + if (controls) { >> + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); >> + } > > No need for { } on a single line statement. > if (controls) > ctrls.merge(*controls, true); > > is sufficient in our code style. > > >> + >> + start(&ctrls); >> + >> + queueCount_ = 0; >> + captureCount_ = 0; >> + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; >> + >> + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); >> + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; > > I'm curious. Why shared and not make_unique? Is it kept / shared in > multiple locations? I guess I'll see later. > >> + return timeSheet; >> +} >> + >> +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) >> +{ >> + queueCount_++; >> + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) > > Should this return an error as it's /not/ queueing? Maybe not essential > ... lets see how it's used... > > > Probably not as we just want to stop queueing and we still want to wait > for the requests queued to complete... > > >> + return 0; >> + >> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); >> + if (ts) { >> + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); >> + } > > Single line so no braces, same elsewhere. > >> + >> + return camera_->queueRequest(request); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) >> +{ >> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); >> + if (ts) { >> + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); >> + } >> + >> + captureCount_++; >> + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { >> + loop_->exit(0); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); >> + if (queueRequest(request)) >> + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() >> +{ >> + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); >> + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); >> + >> + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ >> + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { >> + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); >> + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); >> + queueRequest(request.get()); >> + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); >> + } >> + >> + /* Run capture session. */ >> + loop_ = new EventLoop(); >> + loop_->exec(); >> + stop(); >> + delete loop_; >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + >> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); >> + //wait a few frames to settle > > /* Single line comment style. */ > >> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); >> + ts.printAllInfos(); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); >> + >> + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > > I'd wrap this a little, but it's better to keep the comment in one. > Perhaps: > > EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) > << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > >> + /* >> + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). >> + * This should be investigated. >> + */ > > indentation is broken here. Also lines could be wrapped to target > 80chars. > > > >> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " >> + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; >> + >> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >> + >> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > > Same here, I'd wrap the message to the line below. But that's all we can > do here I think. > > "changed too much2 frames" probably needs cleaning up. > >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >> + //wait a few frames to settle >> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >> + >> + /* No increase just before setting gain */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; >> + /* >> + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation >> + */ > > Same indentation issues here, and wrapping where possible. > >> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " >> + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; >> + >> + /* No increase just after setting gain */ >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > > "latest */" > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() >> +{ >> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); >> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >> + >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); >> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); >> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > > "latest */" > >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >> +} >> + >> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() >> +{ >> + ControlList startValues; >> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); >> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >> + >> + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); >> + >> + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ >> + >> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); >> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >> + >> + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); >> + >> + runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); >> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); >> + >> + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ >> + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); >> + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); >> +} >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..e783f024 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls >> + */ >> + >> +#pragma once >> + >> +#include <memory> >> + >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >> + >> +#include "../common/event_loop.h" >> + >> +#include "simple_capture.h" >> +#include "time_sheet.h" >> + >> +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture >> +{ >> +public: >> + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); >> + >> + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); >> + void runCaptureSession(); >> + >> + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); >> + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); >> + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); >> + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); >> + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); >> + >> + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); >> + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; >> + >> + unsigned int queueCount_; >> + unsigned int captureCount_; >> + unsigned int captureLimit_; >> + >> + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; >> +}; >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >> index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) >> } >> } >> >> -void SimpleCapture::start() >> +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) >> { >> Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); >> int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); >> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() >> >> camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); >> >> - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; >> + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; >> } >> >> void SimpleCapture::stop() >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >> index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 >> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: >> SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); >> virtual ~SimpleCapture(); >> >> - void start(); >> + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); >> void stop(); > > > I would suggest breaking out the change here that enables setting > controls at SimpleCapture::start() to it's own patch. > > >> >> virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..9a0e6544 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > > I think introducting TimeSheet can be a separate patch to make it > clearer. > > >> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * time_sheet.cpp >> + */ >> +#include "time_sheet.h" >> + >> +#include <sstream> >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >> + >> +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" >> +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" >> + >> +using namespace libcamera; >> + >> +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) >> +{ >> + return (double)*data; > > Oh, from the name "calcPixelMean" I was expecting a calculation, not > just a cast. It was actually coincidence that I happened to start with pixel formats where a simple cast is sufficient. In case of RGB it would be a calculation :-) > > > Maybe "double readPixelNV12()" or something. > > I think Laurent started looking at some 'image' type classes to tackle > something similar to this problem. > That would be nice. Cheers, Stefan > >> +} >> + >> +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) >> +{ >> + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); >> +} >> + >> +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) >> +{ >> + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); >> + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { >> + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); >> + if (in.isValid()) { >> + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); >> + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); >> + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); >> + >> + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; >> + int pixelStride; >> + >> + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { >> + case formats::NV12: >> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; >> + pixelStride = 1; >> + break; >> + case formats::SRGGB10: >> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; >> + pixelStride = 2; >> + break; >> + default: >> + std::stringstream s; >> + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; >> + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); >> + } >> + >> + double sum = 0; >> + int w = 20; >> + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; >> + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; >> + >> + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { >> + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; >> + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { >> + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); >> + } >> + } >> + sum = sum / (w * w); >> + return sum; >> + } >> + } >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) >> + : controls_(idmap) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) >> +{ >> + metadata_ = request->metadata(); >> + >> + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); >> + if (previous) { >> + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); >> + } >> + sequence_ = request->sequence(); >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() >> +{ >> + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; >> + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; >> + >> + if (!metadata_.empty()) { >> + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; >> + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); >> + assert(idMap); >> + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { >> + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; >> + } >> + } >> +} >> + >> +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) >> +{ >> + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; >> + if (!entry) >> + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); >> + return *entry; >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) >> +{ >> + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) >> +{ >> + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); >> + auto &entry = get(sequence); >> + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; >> + if (sequence >= 1) { >> + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); >> + } >> + >> + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); >> +} >> + >> +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() >> +{ >> + for (auto entry : entries_) { >> + if (entry) >> + entry->printInfo(); >> + } >> +} >> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..c155763c >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >> + * >> + * time_sheet.h >> + */ >> + >> +#pragma once >> + >> +#include <future> >> +#include <vector> >> + >> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >> + >> +class TimeSheetEntry >> +{ >> +public: >> + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); >> + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; >> + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; >> + >> + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; >> + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; >> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); >> + void printInfo(); >> + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; >> + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; >> + >> +private: >> + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; >> + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; >> + libcamera::ControlList controls_; >> + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; >> + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; >> +}; >> + >> +class TimeSheet >> +{ >> +public: >> + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) >> + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; >> + >> + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); >> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); >> + void printAllInfos(); >> + >> + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; >> + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); >> + >> +private: >> + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; >> + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; >> +}; >> -- >> 2.40.1 >>
Hi Stefan On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 13:22, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > Hi David, > > Am 01.03.24 um 13:04 schrieb David Plowman: > > Hi Stefan > > > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 11:22, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi David, > >> > >> thanks for your comment. This is the same message I sent before, but with proper > >> linewrapping - sorry about that. > >> > >> Am 01.03.24 um 08:56 schrieb David Plowman: > >>> Hi Stefan > >>> > >>> Thanks for posting this and re-starting the discussion of per-frame controls. > >>> > >>> Could you perhaps just summarise exactly what you mean by per-frame > >>> controls, that is to say, what is being tested here? > >>> > >>> Eye-balling the code, I think I understood that: > >>> > >>> * You are setting controls in a specific request. > >>> * When that request completes, you are expecting the controls to have > >>> taken effect in the images that were returned with that request (but > >>> not earlier). > >>> > >>> But I wasn't totally sure - have I understood that correctly? > >>> > >>> Also, do we know if any other pipeline handlers implement this > >>> behaviour? Do folks think that all pipeline handlers should implement > >>> this behaviour? > >>> > >>> Thanks again! > >>> David > >>> > >> You are completely right. This needs a bit more context. > >> > >> It all started on my side with implementing metadata support in SimplePipeline > >> handler. I soon hit some corner cases where I expected things to behave > >> differently in cooperation with DelayedControls. So either I hit a bug in > >> DelayedControls or I didn't fully understand the concept behind it. > >> > >> I ended up changing several things in DelayedControls which I believe where > >> correct. The question then was how to prove correctness as all current users of > >> DelayedControls where ISP implementations. There are some unittests, but the > >> order of calls in these tests also felt counterintuitive (might well be, that > >> it's just missing knowledge on my side). > >> > >> In that area there were also no tests in lc-compliance which tested the > >> behaviour of an actual sensor/isp combination. So I started to write these tests > >> with my personal expectation of how I believe things should work. These tests > >> pass on my SimplePipeline. I also tried to massage the rkisp pipeline to pass > >> these tests and hit some corners where work would be required. > >> > >> Before digging deeper into that I believe it makes sense to see if my > >> expectations are correct and if a broader audience agrees to them. So here we > >> are, that's the reason for the RFC. > >> > >> Now on to the technical details: > >> Yes my expectation on per-frame-controls would be: If I queue something for > >> frame x, I expect that the system tries to fullfill exacty that request (and > >> never earlier). I'm well aware that this will not be possible in every case when > >> an ISP is involved, so the ISP should do the best it can, but the metadata > >> should reflect what was actually achieved. All the tests are currently for > >> manual mode, so no regulation is involved (at least for the params I test). > >> > >> Do you agree with these assumptions? Looking forward to your opinion. > > > > Thanks for the clarification, and glad that I've understood! > > > > A bit of context from our side... We looked at and implemented a > > per-frame controls solution for the Raspberry Pi back in summer 2022. > > I would say there were a couple of differences: > > > > 1. We included a mechanism for reporting failure cases. The only real > > failure case we have is failing to update camera exposure/gain > > settings in time because there is quite a short window in which to > > service the camera frame interrupts (especially when the system is > > busy and the framerate is fast). > > That's interesting. Could you explain the mechanics you used for that > feedback or point me to a patchset? Would be interesting to see which > failure cases you modelled. How did you test these? The last time we did any work on this was last summer for a libcamera F2F in Prague. I think this https://github.com/naushir/libcamera/tree/pfc_update was the code we were running at that time. Obviously things have moved on since then, not least the existence of Pi 5, which will need handling as well. The way the feedback worked was that you got a sequence number every time you submitted a request with controls in it (distinct from the request sequence number), which we called the "submit id". Every request that completed contained one of these sequence numbers indicating which the most recent controls were that had been applied, and this was known as the "sync id". So to ask "does this request implement the controls that I set in it when I queued it?" you would check "requset->syncId == request->submitId". > > > > The mechanism allowed the application to check whether controls had > > been applied as expected, or whether they'd been delayed to the next > > frame. It told you whether they'd got "merged" with the next set of > > controls, or whether all the controls are now running "a frame late". > > > > 2. We implemented our scheme in the same way as you've described, > > where the request where you set the controls has the first images that > > fulfill the request. We called this "Android mode" though tbh I'm not > > sure whether or not this really is what Android does!!! > > > > Although in the end we decided we didn't like this behaviour so much > > because controls get delayed to the back of all the requests that have > > been queued (and we normally queue quite a lot so as to avoid the risk > > Why was it necessary to move them to the back of all request? I guess in > a typical usecase most requests would not contain controls (at least not > from user side). So there would be a way to apply them as early in the > queue as possible. I guess I'm missing somethimng here. Sorry, I'm not being super clear! We never "moved" controls to the back of the requests, the problem is that when you queue a request with some controls in it, those controls are necessarily behind all the other requests that you queued previously. So you have potentially many extra frames of latency. But you're exactly right, most requests don't contain any controls, so we used to move the controls up the request queue so that they would happen earlier. > > > of frame drops). So we also added "Raspberry Pi mode" where controls > > are applied earlier. > > > > In principle I would be happy to let the Pi run in either mode > > ("Android" or "Pi"), so long as we can choose "Pi mode" for our > > applications. In both cases the same reporting mechanism told the > > application exactly when the controls had been applied, so that > > applications could be "mode" agnostic. > > > > Since Summer 2022, per-frame controls have not really progressed so > > far as I know. We are intending to resurrect our per-frame controls > > implementation again once we've got over the Pi 5 libcamera > > integration, so I'm very happy to be resuming this discussion. > > Sure. Would be great if we could come up with a set of tests that wee > all agree on. I agree! Though the last 18 months suggests to me that we're not there yet. There's currently work going on that splits buffers out of requests. To me, the problem with the control lists suggests that possibly controls should have their own queues and be removed from requests as well. At which point this all becomes an even bigger discussion. So I'm kind of sorry to be listing all the ways in which per-frame controls are an unresolved problem, but not really knowing where it goes from here. Nonetheless, we are wanting to move forward once the Pi 5 integration is out of the way. David > > Cheers, > Stefan > > > > > Thanks! > > David > > > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Stefan > >> > >>> > >>> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:01, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at > >>>> the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. > >>>> > >>>> This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by > >>>> calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. > >>>> > >>>> Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch > >>>> with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a > >>>> current master :-) > >>>> > >>>> Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. > >>>> Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in > >>>> the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. > >>>> Which is exactly what this test shall proove. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> > >>>> --- > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ > >>>> 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > >>>> index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 > >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > >>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > >>>> #include <gtest/gtest.h> > >>>> > >>>> #include "environment.h" > >>>> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > >>>> #include "simple_capture.h" > >>>> > >>>> using namespace libcamera; > >>>> @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, > >>>> testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), > >>>> testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), > >>>> SingleStream::nameParameters); > >>>> + > >>>> +/* > >>>> + * Test Per frame controls > >>>> + */ > >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > >>>> + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > >>>> + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > >>>> + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > >>>> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > >>>> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > >>>> +} > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > >>>> index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 > >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > >>>> @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ > >>>> 'capture_test.cpp', > >>>> 'environment.cpp', > >>>> 'main.cpp', > >>>> + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', > >>>> 'simple_capture.cpp', > >>>> + 'time_sheet.cpp', > >>>> ]) > >>>> > >>>> lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > >>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>> index 00000000..70fc44ac > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ > >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > >>>> +/* > >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > >>>> + * > >>>> + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls > >>>> + */ > >>>> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > >>>> + > >>>> +#include <gtest/gtest.h> > >>>> + > >>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" > >>>> + > >>>> +using namespace libcamera; > >>>> + > >>>> +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) > >>>> + : SimpleCapture(camera) > >>>> +{ > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); > >>>> + /* Ensure defined default values */ > >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); > >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); > >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > >>>> + > >>>> + if (controls) { > >>>> + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + start(&ctrls); > >>>> + > >>>> + queueCount_ = 0; > >>>> + captureCount_ = 0; > >>>> + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; > >>>> + > >>>> + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); > >>>> + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; > >>>> + return timeSheet; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + queueCount_++; > >>>> + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) > >>>> + return 0; > >>>> + > >>>> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > >>>> + if (ts) { > >>>> + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + return camera_->queueRequest(request); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > >>>> + if (ts) { > >>>> + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + captureCount_++; > >>>> + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { > >>>> + loop_->exit(0); > >>>> + return; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); > >>>> + if (queueRequest(request)) > >>>> + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() > >>>> +{ > >>>> + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > >>>> + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ > >>>> + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { > >>>> + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); > >>>> + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); > >>>> + queueRequest(request.get()); > >>>> + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + /* Run capture session. */ > >>>> + loop_ = new EventLoop(); > >>>> + loop_->exec(); > >>>> + stop(); > >>>> + delete loop_; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() > >>>> +{ > >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > >>>> + > >>>> + > >>>> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > >>>> + //wait a few frames to settle > >>>> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); > >>>> + ts.printAllInfos(); > >>>> + > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > >>>> + > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > >>>> + /* > >>>> + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). > >>>> + * This should be investigated. > >>>> + */ > >>>> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > >>>> + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > >>>> + > >>>> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > >>>> + > >>>> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() > >>>> +{ > >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > >>>> + > >>>> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > >>>> + //wait a few frames to settle > >>>> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > >>>> + > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > >>>> + > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* No increase just before setting gain */ > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > >>>> + /* > >>>> + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation > >>>> + */ > >>>> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > >>>> + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > >>>> + > >>>> + /* No increase just after setting gain */ > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() > >>>> +{ > >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > >>>> + > >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > >>>> + > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() > >>>> +{ > >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > >>>> + > >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); > >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); > >>>> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > >>>> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > >>>> + > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() > >>>> +{ > >>>> + ControlList startValues; > >>>> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > >>>> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > >>>> + > >>>> + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > >>>> + > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > >>>> + > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ > >>>> + > >>>> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); > >>>> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > >>>> + > >>>> + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > >>>> + > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > >>>> + > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ > >>>> + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); > >>>> + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); > >>>> +} > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > >>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>> index 00000000..e783f024 > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > >>>> +/* > >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > >>>> + * > >>>> + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls > >>>> + */ > >>>> + > >>>> +#pragma once > >>>> + > >>>> +#include <memory> > >>>> + > >>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > >>>> + > >>>> +#include "../common/event_loop.h" > >>>> + > >>>> +#include "simple_capture.h" > >>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" > >>>> + > >>>> +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture > >>>> +{ > >>>> +public: > >>>> + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > >>>> + > >>>> + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > >>>> + void runCaptureSession(); > >>>> + > >>>> + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > >>>> + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); > >>>> + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > >>>> + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > >>>> + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > >>>> + > >>>> + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > >>>> + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; > >>>> + > >>>> + unsigned int queueCount_; > >>>> + unsigned int captureCount_; > >>>> + unsigned int captureLimit_; > >>>> + > >>>> + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; > >>>> +}; > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > >>>> index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 > >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > >>>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) > >>>> } > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> -void SimpleCapture::start() > >>>> +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) > >>>> { > >>>> Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > >>>> int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); > >>>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() > >>>> > >>>> camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); > >>>> > >>>> - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > >>>> + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> void SimpleCapture::stop() > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > >>>> index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 > >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > >>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: > >>>> SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > >>>> virtual ~SimpleCapture(); > >>>> > >>>> - void start(); > >>>> + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > >>>> void stop(); > >>>> > >>>> virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > >>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>> index 00000000..9a0e6544 > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ > >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > >>>> +/* > >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > >>>> + * > >>>> + * time_sheet.cpp > >>>> + */ > >>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" > >>>> + > >>>> +#include <sstream> > >>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > >>>> + > >>>> +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" > >>>> +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" > >>>> + > >>>> +using namespace libcamera; > >>>> + > >>>> +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + return (double)*data; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); > >>>> + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { > >>>> + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); > >>>> + if (in.isValid()) { > >>>> + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); > >>>> + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); > >>>> + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); > >>>> + > >>>> + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; > >>>> + int pixelStride; > >>>> + > >>>> + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { > >>>> + case formats::NV12: > >>>> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; > >>>> + pixelStride = 1; > >>>> + break; > >>>> + case formats::SRGGB10: > >>>> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; > >>>> + pixelStride = 2; > >>>> + break; > >>>> + default: > >>>> + std::stringstream s; > >>>> + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; > >>>> + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + double sum = 0; > >>>> + int w = 20; > >>>> + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; > >>>> + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; > >>>> + > >>>> + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { > >>>> + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; > >>>> + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { > >>>> + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); > >>>> + } > >>>> + } > >>>> + sum = sum / (w * w); > >>>> + return sum; > >>>> + } > >>>> + } > >>>> + return 0; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) > >>>> + : controls_(idmap) > >>>> +{ > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + metadata_ = request->metadata(); > >>>> + > >>>> + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); > >>>> + if (previous) { > >>>> + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); > >>>> + } > >>>> + sequence_ = request->sequence(); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() > >>>> +{ > >>>> + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; > >>>> + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; > >>>> + > >>>> + if (!metadata_.empty()) { > >>>> + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; > >>>> + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); > >>>> + assert(idMap); > >>>> + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { > >>>> + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; > >>>> + } > >>>> + } > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; > >>>> + if (!entry) > >>>> + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); > >>>> + return *entry; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); > >>>> + auto &entry = get(sequence); > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; > >>>> + if (sequence >= 1) { > >>>> + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() > >>>> +{ > >>>> + for (auto entry : entries_) { > >>>> + if (entry) > >>>> + entry->printInfo(); > >>>> + } > >>>> +} > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > >>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>> index 00000000..c155763c > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ > >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > >>>> +/* > >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > >>>> + * > >>>> + * time_sheet.h > >>>> + */ > >>>> + > >>>> +#pragma once > >>>> + > >>>> +#include <future> > >>>> +#include <vector> > >>>> + > >>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > >>>> + > >>>> +class TimeSheetEntry > >>>> +{ > >>>> +public: > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; > >>>> + > >>>> + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; > >>>> + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; > >>>> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); > >>>> + void printInfo(); > >>>> + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; > >>>> + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; > >>>> + > >>>> +private: > >>>> + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; > >>>> + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; > >>>> + libcamera::ControlList controls_; > >>>> + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; > >>>> + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; > >>>> +}; > >>>> + > >>>> +class TimeSheet > >>>> +{ > >>>> +public: > >>>> + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) > >>>> + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; > >>>> + > >>>> + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); > >>>> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > >>>> + void printAllInfos(); > >>>> + > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); > >>>> + > >>>> +private: > >>>> + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; > >>>> + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; > >>>> +}; > >>>> -- > >>>> 2.40.1 > >>>> > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> > >> Stefan Klug > >> > > -- > Regards, > > Stefan Klug >
Quoting David Plowman (2024-03-04 11:35:41) > Hi Stefan > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 13:22, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > Am 01.03.24 um 13:04 schrieb David Plowman: > > > Hi Stefan > > > > > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 11:22, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi David, > > >> > > >> thanks for your comment. This is the same message I sent before, but with proper > > >> linewrapping - sorry about that. > > >> > > >> Am 01.03.24 um 08:56 schrieb David Plowman: > > >>> Hi Stefan > > >>> > > >>> Thanks for posting this and re-starting the discussion of per-frame controls. > > >>> > > >>> Could you perhaps just summarise exactly what you mean by per-frame > > >>> controls, that is to say, what is being tested here? > > >>> > > >>> Eye-balling the code, I think I understood that: > > >>> > > >>> * You are setting controls in a specific request. > > >>> * When that request completes, you are expecting the controls to have > > >>> taken effect in the images that were returned with that request (but > > >>> not earlier). > > >>> > > >>> But I wasn't totally sure - have I understood that correctly? > > >>> > > >>> Also, do we know if any other pipeline handlers implement this > > >>> behaviour? Do folks think that all pipeline handlers should implement > > >>> this behaviour? > > >>> > > >>> Thanks again! > > >>> David > > >>> > > >> You are completely right. This needs a bit more context. > > >> > > >> It all started on my side with implementing metadata support in SimplePipeline > > >> handler. I soon hit some corner cases where I expected things to behave > > >> differently in cooperation with DelayedControls. So either I hit a bug in > > >> DelayedControls or I didn't fully understand the concept behind it. > > >> > > >> I ended up changing several things in DelayedControls which I believe where > > >> correct. The question then was how to prove correctness as all current users of > > >> DelayedControls where ISP implementations. There are some unittests, but the > > >> order of calls in these tests also felt counterintuitive (might well be, that > > >> it's just missing knowledge on my side). > > >> > > >> In that area there were also no tests in lc-compliance which tested the > > >> behaviour of an actual sensor/isp combination. So I started to write these tests > > >> with my personal expectation of how I believe things should work. These tests > > >> pass on my SimplePipeline. I also tried to massage the rkisp pipeline to pass > > >> these tests and hit some corners where work would be required. > > >> > > >> Before digging deeper into that I believe it makes sense to see if my > > >> expectations are correct and if a broader audience agrees to them. So here we > > >> are, that's the reason for the RFC. > > >> > > >> Now on to the technical details: > > >> Yes my expectation on per-frame-controls would be: If I queue something for > > >> frame x, I expect that the system tries to fullfill exacty that request (and > > >> never earlier). I'm well aware that this will not be possible in every case when > > >> an ISP is involved, so the ISP should do the best it can, but the metadata > > >> should reflect what was actually achieved. All the tests are currently for > > >> manual mode, so no regulation is involved (at least for the params I test). > > >> > > >> Do you agree with these assumptions? Looking forward to your opinion. > > > > > > Thanks for the clarification, and glad that I've understood! > > > > > > A bit of context from our side... We looked at and implemented a > > > per-frame controls solution for the Raspberry Pi back in summer 2022. > > > I would say there were a couple of differences: > > > > > > 1. We included a mechanism for reporting failure cases. The only real > > > failure case we have is failing to update camera exposure/gain > > > settings in time because there is quite a short window in which to > > > service the camera frame interrupts (especially when the system is > > > busy and the framerate is fast). > > > > That's interesting. Could you explain the mechanics you used for that > > feedback or point me to a patchset? Would be interesting to see which > > failure cases you modelled. How did you test these? > > The last time we did any work on this was last summer for a libcamera > F2F in Prague. I think this > https://github.com/naushir/libcamera/tree/pfc_update was the code we > were running at that time. Obviously things have moved on since then, > not least the existence of Pi 5, which will need handling as well. > > The way the feedback worked was that you got a sequence number every > time you submitted a request with controls in it (distinct from the > request sequence number), which we called the "submit id". Every > request that completed contained one of these sequence numbers > indicating which the most recent controls were that had been applied, > and this was known as the "sync id". So to ask "does this request > implement the controls that I set in it when I queued it?" you would > check "requset->syncId == request->submitId". > > > > > > > The mechanism allowed the application to check whether controls had > > > been applied as expected, or whether they'd been delayed to the next > > > frame. It told you whether they'd got "merged" with the next set of > > > controls, or whether all the controls are now running "a frame late". > > > > > > 2. We implemented our scheme in the same way as you've described, > > > where the request where you set the controls has the first images that > > > fulfill the request. We called this "Android mode" though tbh I'm not > > > sure whether or not this really is what Android does!!! > > > > > > Although in the end we decided we didn't like this behaviour so much > > > because controls get delayed to the back of all the requests that have > > > been queued (and we normally queue quite a lot so as to avoid the risk > > > > Why was it necessary to move them to the back of all request? I guess in > > a typical usecase most requests would not contain controls (at least not > > from user side). So there would be a way to apply them as early in the > > queue as possible. I guess I'm missing somethimng here. > > Sorry, I'm not being super clear! We never "moved" controls to the > back of the requests, the problem is that when you queue a request > with some controls in it, those controls are necessarily behind all > the other requests that you queued previously. So you have potentially > many extra frames of latency. > > But you're exactly right, most requests don't contain any controls, so > we used to move the controls up the request queue so that they would > happen earlier. > > > > > > of frame drops). So we also added "Raspberry Pi mode" where controls > > > are applied earlier. > > > > > > In principle I would be happy to let the Pi run in either mode > > > ("Android" or "Pi"), so long as we can choose "Pi mode" for our > > > applications. In both cases the same reporting mechanism told the > > > application exactly when the controls had been applied, so that > > > applications could be "mode" agnostic. > > > > > > Since Summer 2022, per-frame controls have not really progressed so > > > far as I know. We are intending to resurrect our per-frame controls > > > implementation again once we've got over the Pi 5 libcamera > > > integration, so I'm very happy to be resuming this discussion. > > > > Sure. Would be great if we could come up with a set of tests that wee > > all agree on. > > I agree! Though the last 18 months suggests to me that we're not there yet. Indeed, the whole topic hasn't had enough attention or development, I hope that will get more attention soon. > There's currently work going on that splits buffers out of requests. > To me, the problem with the control lists suggests that possibly > controls should have their own queues and be removed from requests as > well. At which point this all becomes an even bigger discussion. > > So I'm kind of sorry to be listing all the ways in which per-frame > controls are an unresolved problem, but not really knowing where it > goes from here. Nonetheless, we are wanting to move forward once the > Pi 5 integration is out of the way. Likewise!. I actually envisaged this work here being more about validating that DelayedControls applies controls correctly at the right frames, and that the delays given for a specific sensor were correct. But it's quickly becoming more involved and the 'per-frame' topic grows ;-) -- Kieran > > David > > > > > Cheers, > > Stefan > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > David > > > > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> Stefan > > >> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:01, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at > > >>>> the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. > > >>>> > > >>>> This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by > > >>>> calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. > > >>>> > > >>>> Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch > > >>>> with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a > > >>>> current master :-) > > >>>> > > >>>> Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. > > >>>> Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in > > >>>> the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. > > >>>> Which is exactly what this test shall proove. > > >>>> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> > > >>>> --- > > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ > > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + > > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ > > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ > > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- > > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- > > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ > > >>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ > > >>>> 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > > >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > > >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > > >>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > > >>>> > > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > > >>>> index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 > > >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp > > >>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > > >>>> #include <gtest/gtest.h> > > >>>> > > >>>> #include "environment.h" > > >>>> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > > >>>> #include "simple_capture.h" > > >>>> > > >>>> using namespace libcamera; > > >>>> @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, > > >>>> testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), > > >>>> testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), > > >>>> SingleStream::nameParameters); > > >>>> + > > >>>> +/* > > >>>> + * Test Per frame controls > > >>>> + */ > > >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > > >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > > >>>> + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > > >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > > >>>> + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > > >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > > >>>> + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > > >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > > >>>> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); > > >>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); > > >>>> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > > >>>> index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 > > >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > > >>>> @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ > > >>>> 'capture_test.cpp', > > >>>> 'environment.cpp', > > >>>> 'main.cpp', > > >>>> + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', > > >>>> 'simple_capture.cpp', > > >>>> + 'time_sheet.cpp', > > >>>> ]) > > >>>> > > >>>> lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, > > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > > >>>> new file mode 100644 > > >>>> index 00000000..70fc44ac > > >>>> --- /dev/null > > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp > > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ > > >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > > >>>> +/* > > >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > > >>>> + * > > >>>> + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls > > >>>> + */ > > >>>> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#include <gtest/gtest.h> > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" > > >>>> + > > >>>> +using namespace libcamera; > > >>>> + > > >>>> +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) > > >>>> + : SimpleCapture(camera) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); > > >>>> + /* Ensure defined default values */ > > >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); > > >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); > > >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > > >>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + if (controls) { > > >>>> + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + > > >>>> + start(&ctrls); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + queueCount_ = 0; > > >>>> + captureCount_ = 0; > > >>>> + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); > > >>>> + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; > > >>>> + return timeSheet; > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + queueCount_++; > > >>>> + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) > > >>>> + return 0; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > > >>>> + if (ts) { > > >>>> + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + > > >>>> + return camera_->queueRequest(request); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); > > >>>> + if (ts) { > > >>>> + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + > > >>>> + captureCount_++; > > >>>> + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { > > >>>> + loop_->exit(0); > > >>>> + return; > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + > > >>>> + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); > > >>>> + if (queueRequest(request)) > > >>>> + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > > >>>> + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ > > >>>> + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { > > >>>> + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); > > >>>> + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); > > >>>> + queueRequest(request.get()); > > >>>> + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + > > >>>> + /* Run capture session. */ > > >>>> + loop_ = new EventLoop(); > > >>>> + loop_->exec(); > > >>>> + stop(); > > >>>> + delete loop_; > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > > >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + > > >>>> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > > >>>> + //wait a few frames to settle > > >>>> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); > > >>>> + ts.printAllInfos(); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > > >>>> + /* > > >>>> + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). > > >>>> + * This should be investigated. > > >>>> + */ > > >>>> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > > >>>> + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); > > >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > > >>>> + //wait a few frames to settle > > >>>> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + /* No increase just before setting gain */ > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; > > >>>> + /* > > >>>> + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation > > >>>> + */ > > >>>> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " > > >>>> + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + /* No increase just after setting gain */ > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > > >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > > >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); > > >>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); > > >>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); > > >>>> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); > > >>>> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + ControlList startValues; > > >>>> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); > > >>>> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ > > >>>> + > > >>>> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); > > >>>> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + runCaptureSession(); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); > > >>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ > > >>>> + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); > > >>>> + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > > >>>> new file mode 100644 > > >>>> index 00000000..e783f024 > > >>>> --- /dev/null > > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h > > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > > >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > > >>>> +/* > > >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > > >>>> + * > > >>>> + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls > > >>>> + */ > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#pragma once > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#include <memory> > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#include "../common/event_loop.h" > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#include "simple_capture.h" > > >>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" > > >>>> + > > >>>> +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> +public: > > >>>> + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > > >>>> + void runCaptureSession(); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); > > >>>> + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); > > >>>> + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); > > >>>> + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); > > >>>> + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > > >>>> + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + unsigned int queueCount_; > > >>>> + unsigned int captureCount_; > > >>>> + unsigned int captureLimit_; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; > > >>>> +}; > > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > > >>>> index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 > > >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp > > >>>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) > > >>>> } > > >>>> } > > >>>> > > >>>> -void SimpleCapture::start() > > >>>> +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) > > >>>> { > > >>>> Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); > > >>>> int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); > > >>>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() > > >>>> > > >>>> camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); > > >>>> > > >>>> - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > > >>>> + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; > > >>>> } > > >>>> > > >>>> void SimpleCapture::stop() > > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > > >>>> index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 > > >>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h > > >>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: > > >>>> SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); > > >>>> virtual ~SimpleCapture(); > > >>>> > > >>>> - void start(); > > >>>> + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); > > >>>> void stop(); > > >>>> > > >>>> virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; > > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > > >>>> new file mode 100644 > > >>>> index 00000000..9a0e6544 > > >>>> --- /dev/null > > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp > > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ > > >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > > >>>> +/* > > >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > > >>>> + * > > >>>> + * time_sheet.cpp > > >>>> + */ > > >>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#include <sstream> > > >>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" > > >>>> +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" > > >>>> + > > >>>> +using namespace libcamera; > > >>>> + > > >>>> +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + return (double)*data; > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); > > >>>> + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { > > >>>> + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); > > >>>> + if (in.isValid()) { > > >>>> + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); > > >>>> + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); > > >>>> + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; > > >>>> + int pixelStride; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { > > >>>> + case formats::NV12: > > >>>> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; > > >>>> + pixelStride = 1; > > >>>> + break; > > >>>> + case formats::SRGGB10: > > >>>> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; > > >>>> + pixelStride = 2; > > >>>> + break; > > >>>> + default: > > >>>> + std::stringstream s; > > >>>> + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; > > >>>> + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + > > >>>> + double sum = 0; > > >>>> + int w = 20; > > >>>> + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; > > >>>> + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { > > >>>> + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; > > >>>> + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { > > >>>> + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + sum = sum / (w * w); > > >>>> + return sum; > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + return 0; > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) > > >>>> + : controls_(idmap) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + metadata_ = request->metadata(); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); > > >>>> + if (previous) { > > >>>> + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + sequence_ = request->sequence(); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; > > >>>> + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + if (!metadata_.empty()) { > > >>>> + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; > > >>>> + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); > > >>>> + assert(idMap); > > >>>> + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { > > >>>> + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + } > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; > > >>>> + if (!entry) > > >>>> + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); > > >>>> + return *entry; > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); > > >>>> + auto &entry = get(sequence); > > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; > > >>>> + if (sequence >= 1) { > > >>>> + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); > > >>>> + } > > >>>> + > > >>>> + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); > > >>>> +} > > >>>> + > > >>>> +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> + for (auto entry : entries_) { > > >>>> + if (entry) > > >>>> + entry->printInfo(); > > >>>> + } > > >>>> +} > > >>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > > >>>> new file mode 100644 > > >>>> index 00000000..c155763c > > >>>> --- /dev/null > > >>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h > > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ > > >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ > > >>>> +/* > > >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy > > >>>> + * > > >>>> + * time_sheet.h > > >>>> + */ > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#pragma once > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#include <future> > > >>>> +#include <vector> > > >>>> + > > >>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> > > >>>> + > > >>>> +class TimeSheetEntry > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> +public: > > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); > > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; > > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; > > >>>> + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; > > >>>> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); > > >>>> + void printInfo(); > > >>>> + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; > > >>>> + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; > > >>>> + > > >>>> +private: > > >>>> + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; > > >>>> + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; > > >>>> + libcamera::ControlList controls_; > > >>>> + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; > > >>>> + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; > > >>>> +}; > > >>>> + > > >>>> +class TimeSheet > > >>>> +{ > > >>>> +public: > > >>>> + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) > > >>>> + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; > > >>>> + > > >>>> + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); > > >>>> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); > > >>>> + void printAllInfos(); > > >>>> + > > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; > > >>>> + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); > > >>>> + > > >>>> +private: > > >>>> + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; > > >>>> + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; > > >>>> +}; > > >>>> -- > > >>>> 2.40.1 > > >>>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Stefan Klug > > >> > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Stefan Klug > >
Hi David, Am 04.03.24 um 12:35 schrieb David Plowman: > Hi Stefan > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 13:22, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: >> >> Hi David, >> >> Am 01.03.24 um 13:04 schrieb David Plowman: >>> Hi Stefan >>> >>> On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 11:22, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi David, >>>> >>>> thanks for your comment. This is the same message I sent before, but with proper >>>> linewrapping - sorry about that. >>>> >>>> Am 01.03.24 um 08:56 schrieb David Plowman: >>>>> Hi Stefan >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for posting this and re-starting the discussion of per-frame controls. >>>>> >>>>> Could you perhaps just summarise exactly what you mean by per-frame >>>>> controls, that is to say, what is being tested here? >>>>> >>>>> Eye-balling the code, I think I understood that: >>>>> >>>>> * You are setting controls in a specific request. >>>>> * When that request completes, you are expecting the controls to have >>>>> taken effect in the images that were returned with that request (but >>>>> not earlier). >>>>> >>>>> But I wasn't totally sure - have I understood that correctly? >>>>> >>>>> Also, do we know if any other pipeline handlers implement this >>>>> behaviour? Do folks think that all pipeline handlers should implement >>>>> this behaviour? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks again! >>>>> David >>>>> >>>> You are completely right. This needs a bit more context. >>>> >>>> It all started on my side with implementing metadata support in SimplePipeline >>>> handler. I soon hit some corner cases where I expected things to behave >>>> differently in cooperation with DelayedControls. So either I hit a bug in >>>> DelayedControls or I didn't fully understand the concept behind it. >>>> >>>> I ended up changing several things in DelayedControls which I believe where >>>> correct. The question then was how to prove correctness as all current users of >>>> DelayedControls where ISP implementations. There are some unittests, but the >>>> order of calls in these tests also felt counterintuitive (might well be, that >>>> it's just missing knowledge on my side). >>>> >>>> In that area there were also no tests in lc-compliance which tested the >>>> behaviour of an actual sensor/isp combination. So I started to write these tests >>>> with my personal expectation of how I believe things should work. These tests >>>> pass on my SimplePipeline. I also tried to massage the rkisp pipeline to pass >>>> these tests and hit some corners where work would be required. >>>> >>>> Before digging deeper into that I believe it makes sense to see if my >>>> expectations are correct and if a broader audience agrees to them. So here we >>>> are, that's the reason for the RFC. >>>> >>>> Now on to the technical details: >>>> Yes my expectation on per-frame-controls would be: If I queue something for >>>> frame x, I expect that the system tries to fullfill exacty that request (and >>>> never earlier). I'm well aware that this will not be possible in every case when >>>> an ISP is involved, so the ISP should do the best it can, but the metadata >>>> should reflect what was actually achieved. All the tests are currently for >>>> manual mode, so no regulation is involved (at least for the params I test). >>>> >>>> Do you agree with these assumptions? Looking forward to your opinion. >>> >>> Thanks for the clarification, and glad that I've understood! >>> >>> A bit of context from our side... We looked at and implemented a >>> per-frame controls solution for the Raspberry Pi back in summer 2022. >>> I would say there were a couple of differences: >>> >>> 1. We included a mechanism for reporting failure cases. The only real >>> failure case we have is failing to update camera exposure/gain >>> settings in time because there is quite a short window in which to >>> service the camera frame interrupts (especially when the system is >>> busy and the framerate is fast). >> >> That's interesting. Could you explain the mechanics you used for that >> feedback or point me to a patchset? Would be interesting to see which >> failure cases you modelled. How did you test these? > > The last time we did any work on this was last summer for a libcamera > F2F in Prague. I think this > https://github.com/naushir/libcamera/tree/pfc_update was the code we > were running at that time. Obviously things have moved on since then, > not least the existence of Pi 5, which will need handling as well. > > The way the feedback worked was that you got a sequence number every > time you submitted a request with controls in it (distinct from the > request sequence number), which we called the "submit id". Every > request that completed contained one of these sequence numbers > indicating which the most recent controls were that had been applied, > and this was known as the "sync id". So to ask "does this request > implement the controls that I set in it when I queued it?" you would > check "requset->syncId == request->submitId". > >>> >>> The mechanism allowed the application to check whether controls had >>> been applied as expected, or whether they'd been delayed to the next >>> frame. It told you whether they'd got "merged" with the next set of >>> controls, or whether all the controls are now running "a frame late". >>> >>> 2. We implemented our scheme in the same way as you've described, >>> where the request where you set the controls has the first images that >>> fulfill the request. We called this "Android mode" though tbh I'm not >>> sure whether or not this really is what Android does!!! >>> >>> Although in the end we decided we didn't like this behaviour so much >>> because controls get delayed to the back of all the requests that have >>> been queued (and we normally queue quite a lot so as to avoid the risk >> >> Why was it necessary to move them to the back of all request? I guess in >> a typical usecase most requests would not contain controls (at least not >> from user side). So there would be a way to apply them as early in the >> queue as possible. I guess I'm missing somethimng here. > > Sorry, I'm not being super clear! We never "moved" controls to the > back of the requests, the problem is that when you queue a request > with some controls in it, those controls are necessarily behind all > the other requests that you queued previously. So you have potentially > many extra frames of latency. > > But you're exactly right, most requests don't contain any controls, so > we used to move the controls up the request queue so that they would > happen earlier. Now I got it! Thanks. That makes perfect sense now. > >> >>> of frame drops). So we also added "Raspberry Pi mode" where controls >>> are applied earlier. >>> >>> In principle I would be happy to let the Pi run in either mode >>> ("Android" or "Pi"), so long as we can choose "Pi mode" for our >>> applications. In both cases the same reporting mechanism told the >>> application exactly when the controls had been applied, so that >>> applications could be "mode" agnostic. >>> >>> Since Summer 2022, per-frame controls have not really progressed so >>> far as I know. We are intending to resurrect our per-frame controls >>> implementation again once we've got over the Pi 5 libcamera >>> integration, so I'm very happy to be resuming this discussion. >> >> Sure. Would be great if we could come up with a set of tests that wee >> all agree on. > > I agree! Though the last 18 months suggests to me that we're not there yet. > > There's currently work going on that splits buffers out of requests. > To me, the problem with the control lists suggests that possibly > controls should have their own queues and be removed from requests as > well. At which point this all becomes an even bigger discussion. > > So I'm kind of sorry to be listing all the ways in which per-frame > controls are an unresolved problem, but not really knowing where it > goes from here. Nonetheless, we are wanting to move forward once the > Pi 5 integration is out of the way. Don't feel sorry. At least I'm aware of some of the nasty details now :-) Stefan > > David > >> >> Cheers, >> Stefan >> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> David >>> >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Stefan >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:01, Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at >>>>>> the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by >>>>>> calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. >>>>>> >>>>>> Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch >>>>>> with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a >>>>>> current master :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. >>>>>> Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in >>>>>> the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. >>>>>> Which is exactly what this test shall proove. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ >>>>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + >>>>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ >>>>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- >>>>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- >>>>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ >>>>>> src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ >>>>>> 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >>>>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >>>>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >>>>>> create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >>>>>> index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 >>>>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >>>>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp >>>>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ >>>>>> #include <gtest/gtest.h> >>>>>> >>>>>> #include "environment.h" >>>>>> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" >>>>>> #include "simple_capture.h" >>>>>> >>>>>> using namespace libcamera; >>>>>> @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, >>>>>> testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), >>>>>> testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), >>>>>> SingleStream::nameParameters); >>>>>> + >>>>>> +/* >>>>>> + * Test Per frame controls >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >>>>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >>>>>> + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >>>>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >>>>>> + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >>>>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >>>>>> + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >>>>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >>>>>> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); >>>>>> + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); >>>>>> + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >>>>>> index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 >>>>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >>>>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build >>>>>> @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ >>>>>> 'capture_test.cpp', >>>>>> 'environment.cpp', >>>>>> 'main.cpp', >>>>>> + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', >>>>>> 'simple_capture.cpp', >>>>>> + 'time_sheet.cpp', >>>>>> ]) >>>>>> >>>>>> lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, >>>>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >>>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>>> index 00000000..70fc44ac >>>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp >>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ >>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >>>>>> +/* >>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >>>>>> + * >>>>>> + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> +#include "per_frame_controls.h" >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#include <gtest/gtest.h> >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" >>>>>> + >>>>>> +using namespace libcamera; >>>>>> + >>>>>> +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) >>>>>> + : SimpleCapture(camera) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); >>>>>> + /* Ensure defined default values */ >>>>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); >>>>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); >>>>>> + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >>>>>> + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + if (controls) { >>>>>> + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + >>>>>> + start(&ctrls); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + queueCount_ = 0; >>>>>> + captureCount_ = 0; >>>>>> + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); >>>>>> + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; >>>>>> + return timeSheet; >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + queueCount_++; >>>>>> + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) >>>>>> + return 0; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); >>>>>> + if (ts) { >>>>>> + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + >>>>>> + return camera_->queueRequest(request); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); >>>>>> + if (ts) { >>>>>> + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + >>>>>> + captureCount_++; >>>>>> + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { >>>>>> + loop_->exit(0); >>>>>> + return; >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + >>>>>> + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); >>>>>> + if (queueRequest(request)) >>>>>> + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); >>>>>> + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ >>>>>> + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { >>>>>> + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); >>>>>> + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); >>>>>> + queueRequest(request.get()); >>>>>> + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* Run capture session. */ >>>>>> + loop_ = new EventLoop(); >>>>>> + loop_->exec(); >>>>>> + stop(); >>>>>> + delete loop_; >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); >>>>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + >>>>>> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); >>>>>> + //wait a few frames to settle >>>>>> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); >>>>>> + ts.printAllInfos(); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; >>>>>> + /* >>>>>> + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). >>>>>> + * This should be investigated. >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " >>>>>> + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); >>>>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >>>>>> + //wait a few frames to settle >>>>>> + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* No increase just before setting gain */ >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; >>>>>> + /* >>>>>> + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " >>>>>> + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* No increase just after setting gain */ >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); >>>>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >>>>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); >>>>>> + auto &ts = *timeSheet; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); >>>>>> + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); >>>>>> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); >>>>>> + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + ControlList startValues; >>>>>> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); >>>>>> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ >>>>>> + >>>>>> + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); >>>>>> + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + runCaptureSession(); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); >>>>>> + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ >>>>>> + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); >>>>>> + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >>>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>>> index 00000000..e783f024 >>>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h >>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ >>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >>>>>> +/* >>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >>>>>> + * >>>>>> + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#pragma once >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#include <memory> >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#include "../common/event_loop.h" >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#include "simple_capture.h" >>>>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" >>>>>> + >>>>>> +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> +public: >>>>>> + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); >>>>>> + void runCaptureSession(); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); >>>>>> + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); >>>>>> + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); >>>>>> + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); >>>>>> + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); >>>>>> + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + unsigned int queueCount_; >>>>>> + unsigned int captureCount_; >>>>>> + unsigned int captureLimit_; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; >>>>>> +}; >>>>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >>>>>> index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 >>>>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >>>>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp >>>>>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) >>>>>> } >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> -void SimpleCapture::start() >>>>>> +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) >>>>>> { >>>>>> Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); >>>>>> int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); >>>>>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() >>>>>> >>>>>> camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); >>>>>> >>>>>> - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; >>>>>> + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> void SimpleCapture::stop() >>>>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >>>>>> index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 >>>>>> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >>>>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h >>>>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: >>>>>> SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); >>>>>> virtual ~SimpleCapture(); >>>>>> >>>>>> - void start(); >>>>>> + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); >>>>>> void stop(); >>>>>> >>>>>> virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; >>>>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >>>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>>> index 00000000..9a0e6544 >>>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp >>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ >>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ >>>>>> +/* >>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >>>>>> + * >>>>>> + * time_sheet.cpp >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> +#include "time_sheet.h" >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#include <sstream> >>>>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" >>>>>> +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" >>>>>> + >>>>>> +using namespace libcamera; >>>>>> + >>>>>> +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + return (double)*data; >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); >>>>>> + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { >>>>>> + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); >>>>>> + if (in.isValid()) { >>>>>> + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); >>>>>> + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); >>>>>> + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; >>>>>> + int pixelStride; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { >>>>>> + case formats::NV12: >>>>>> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; >>>>>> + pixelStride = 1; >>>>>> + break; >>>>>> + case formats::SRGGB10: >>>>>> + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; >>>>>> + pixelStride = 2; >>>>>> + break; >>>>>> + default: >>>>>> + std::stringstream s; >>>>>> + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; >>>>>> + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + >>>>>> + double sum = 0; >>>>>> + int w = 20; >>>>>> + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; >>>>>> + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { >>>>>> + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; >>>>>> + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { >>>>>> + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + sum = sum / (w * w); >>>>>> + return sum; >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + return 0; >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) >>>>>> + : controls_(idmap) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + metadata_ = request->metadata(); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); >>>>>> + if (previous) { >>>>>> + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + sequence_ = request->sequence(); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; >>>>>> + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + if (!metadata_.empty()) { >>>>>> + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; >>>>>> + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); >>>>>> + assert(idMap); >>>>>> + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { >>>>>> + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + } >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; >>>>>> + if (!entry) >>>>>> + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); >>>>>> + return *entry; >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); >>>>>> + auto &entry = get(sequence); >>>>>> + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; >>>>>> + if (sequence >= 1) { >>>>>> + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + >>>>>> + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + for (auto entry : entries_) { >>>>>> + if (entry) >>>>>> + entry->printInfo(); >>>>>> + } >>>>>> +} >>>>>> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >>>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>>> index 00000000..c155763c >>>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>>> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h >>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ >>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ >>>>>> +/* >>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy >>>>>> + * >>>>>> + * time_sheet.h >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#pragma once >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#include <future> >>>>>> +#include <vector> >>>>>> + >>>>>> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> >>>>>> + >>>>>> +class TimeSheetEntry >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> +public: >>>>>> + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); >>>>>> + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; >>>>>> + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; >>>>>> + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; >>>>>> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); >>>>>> + void printInfo(); >>>>>> + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; >>>>>> + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; >>>>>> + >>>>>> +private: >>>>>> + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; >>>>>> + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; >>>>>> + libcamera::ControlList controls_; >>>>>> + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; >>>>>> + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; >>>>>> +}; >>>>>> + >>>>>> +class TimeSheet >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> +public: >>>>>> + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) >>>>>> + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); >>>>>> + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); >>>>>> + void printAllInfos(); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; >>>>>> + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); >>>>>> + >>>>>> +private: >>>>>> + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; >>>>>> + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; >>>>>> +}; >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 2.40.1 >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Stefan Klug >>>> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Stefan Klug >>
diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp index 1dcfcf92..43fe59f3 100644 --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include <gtest/gtest.h> #include "environment.h" +#include "per_frame_controls.h" #include "simple_capture.h" using namespace libcamera; @@ -133,3 +134,41 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests, testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES), testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)), SingleStream::nameParameters); + +/* + * Test Per frame controls + */ +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseExposureChange) +{ + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); + capture.testFramePreciseExposureChange(); +} + +TEST_F(SingleStream, testFramePreciseGainChange) +{ + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); + capture.testFramePreciseGainChange(); +} + +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame) +{ + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); + capture.testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); +} + +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied) +{ + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); +} + +TEST_F(SingleStream, testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied) +{ + PerFrameControls capture(camera_); + capture.configure(StreamRole::Viewfinder); + capture.testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); +} diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build index c792f072..2a6f52af 100644 --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ 'capture_test.cpp', 'environment.cpp', 'main.cpp', + 'per_frame_controls.cpp', 'simple_capture.cpp', + 'time_sheet.cpp', ]) lc_compliance = executable('lc-compliance', lc_compliance_sources, diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp new file mode 100644 index 00000000..70fc44ac --- /dev/null +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy + * + * per_frame_controls.cpp - Tests for per frame controls + */ +#include "per_frame_controls.h" + +#include <gtest/gtest.h> + +#include "time_sheet.h" + +using namespace libcamera; + +PerFrameControls::PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera) + : SimpleCapture(camera) +{ +} + +std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> PerFrameControls::startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const ControlList *controls) +{ + ControlList ctrls(camera_->controls().idmap()); + /* Ensure defined default values */ + ctrls.set(controls::AeEnable, false); + ctrls.set(controls::AeExposureMode, controls::ExposureCustom); + ctrls.set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); + ctrls.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); + + if (controls) { + ctrls.merge(*controls, true); + } + + start(&ctrls); + + queueCount_ = 0; + captureCount_ = 0; + captureLimit_ = framesToCapture; + + auto timeSheet = std::make_shared<TimeSheet>(captureLimit_, camera_->controls().idmap()); + timeSheet_ = timeSheet; + return timeSheet; +} + +int PerFrameControls::queueRequest(Request *request) +{ + queueCount_++; + if (queueCount_ > captureLimit_) + return 0; + + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); + if (ts) { + ts->prepareForQueue(request, queueCount_ - 1); + } + + return camera_->queueRequest(request); +} + +void PerFrameControls::requestComplete(Request *request) +{ + auto ts = timeSheet_.lock(); + if (ts) { + ts->handleCompleteRequest(request); + } + + captureCount_++; + if (captureCount_ >= captureLimit_) { + loop_->exit(0); + return; + } + + request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers); + if (queueRequest(request)) + loop_->exit(-EINVAL); +} + +void PerFrameControls::runCaptureSession() +{ + Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); + const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer>> &buffers = allocator_->buffers(stream); + + /* Queue the recommended number of reqeuests. */ + for (const std::unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : buffers) { + std::unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest(); + request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get()); + queueRequest(request.get()); + requests_.push_back(std::move(request)); + } + + /* Run capture session. */ + loop_ = new EventLoop(); + loop_->exec(); + stop(); + delete loop_; +} + +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseExposureChange() +{ + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); + auto &ts = *timeSheet; + + + ts[3].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); + //wait a few frames to settle + ts[6].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 20000); + ts.printAllInfos(); + + runCaptureSession(); + + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 20000, 20); + + /* No increase just before setting exposure */ + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; + /* + * Todo: The change is brightness was a bit low (Exposure time increase by 4x resulted in a brightness increase of < 2). + * This should be investigated. + */ + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.3) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " + << ts[3].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; + + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; + + /* No increase just after setting exposure */ + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[8].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much2 frames after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; +} + +void PerFrameControls::testFramePreciseGainChange() +{ + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(10); + auto &ts = *timeSheet; + + ts[3].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); + //wait a few frames to settle + ts[6].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); + + runCaptureSession(); + + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.1); + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[6].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); + + /* No increase just before setting gain */ + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[5].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much before the expected time of change (control delay too high?)."; + /* + * Todo: I see a brightness change of roughly half the expected one. This is not yet understood and needs investigation + */ + EXPECT_GT(ts[6].getBrightnessChange(), 1.7) << "Brightness in frame " << 6 << " did not increase as expected (reference: " + << ts[5].getSpotBrightness() << " current: " << ts[6].getSpotBrightness() << " )" << std::endl; + + /* No increase just after setting gain */ + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[7].getBrightnessChange(), 1.0, 0.05) << "Brightness changed too much after the expected time of change (control delay too low?)."; +} + +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied() +{ + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); + auto &ts = *timeSheet; + + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); + + runCaptureSession(); + + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); +} + +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied() +{ + auto timeSheet = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(5); + auto &ts = *timeSheet; + + ts[0].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 8000); + ts[0].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 2.0); + ts[1].controls().set(controls::ExposureTime, 10000); + ts[1].controls().set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); + + runCaptureSession(); + + /* We expect it to be applied after 3 frames, the latest*/ + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 10000, 20); + EXPECT_NEAR(ts[4].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.1); +} + +void PerFrameControls::testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame() +{ + ControlList startValues; + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 5000); + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 1.0); + + auto ts1 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); + + runCaptureSession(); + + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 5000, 20); + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts1)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 1.0, 0.01); + + /* Second capture with different values to ensure we don't hit default/old values */ + + startValues.set(controls::ExposureTime, 15000); + startValues.set(controls::AnalogueGain, 4.0); + + auto ts2 = startCaptureWithTimeSheet(3, &startValues); + + runCaptureSession(); + + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::ExposureTime).value(), 15000, 20); + EXPECT_NEAR((*ts2)[0].metadata().get(controls::AnalogueGain).value(), 4.0, 0.01); + + /* with 3x exposure and 4x gain we could expect a brightness increase of 2x */ + double brightnessChange = ts2->get(1).getSpotBrightness() / ts1->get(1).getSpotBrightness(); + EXPECT_GT(brightnessChange, 2.0); +} diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e783f024 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy + * + * per_frame_controls.h - Tests for per frame controls + */ + +#pragma once + +#include <memory> + +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> + +#include "../common/event_loop.h" + +#include "simple_capture.h" +#include "time_sheet.h" + +class PerFrameControls : public SimpleCapture +{ +public: + PerFrameControls(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); + + std::shared_ptr<TimeSheet> startCaptureWithTimeSheet(unsigned int framesToCapture, const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); + void runCaptureSession(); + + void testFramePreciseExposureChange(); + void testFramePreciseGainChange(); + void testExposureGainIsAppliedOnFirstFrame(); + void testExposureGainFromFirstRequestGetsApplied(); + void testExposureGainFromFirstAndSecondRequestGetsApplied(); + + int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request); + void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) override; + + unsigned int queueCount_; + unsigned int captureCount_; + unsigned int captureLimit_; + + std::weak_ptr<TimeSheet> timeSheet_; +}; diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp index cf4d7cf3..56680a83 100644 --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::configure(StreamRole role) } } -void SimpleCapture::start() +void SimpleCapture::start(const ControlList *controls) { Stream *stream = config_->at(0).stream(); int count = allocator_->allocate(stream); @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void SimpleCapture::start() camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &SimpleCapture::requestComplete); - ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(controls), 0) << "Failed to start camera"; } void SimpleCapture::stop() diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h index 2911d601..54b1d54b 100644 --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ protected: SimpleCapture(std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera); virtual ~SimpleCapture(); - void start(); + void start(const libcamera::ControlList *controls = nullptr); void stop(); virtual void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request) = 0; diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9a0e6544 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy + * + * time_sheet.cpp + */ +#include "time_sheet.h" + +#include <sstream> +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> + +#include "libcamera/internal/formats.h" +#include "libcamera/internal/mapped_framebuffer.h" + +using namespace libcamera; + +double calcPixelMeanNV12(const uint8_t *data) +{ + return (double)*data; +} + +double calcPixelMeanRAW10(const uint8_t *data) +{ + return (double)*((const uint16_t *)data); +} + +double calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(libcamera::Request *request) +{ + const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers(); + for (const auto &[stream, buffer] : buffers) { + MappedFrameBuffer in(buffer, MappedFrameBuffer::MapFlag::Read); + if (in.isValid()) { + auto data = in.planes()[0].data(); + auto streamConfig = stream->configuration(); + auto formatInfo = PixelFormatInfo::info(streamConfig.pixelFormat); + + std::function<double(const uint8_t *data)> calcPixelMean; + int pixelStride; + + switch (streamConfig.pixelFormat) { + case formats::NV12: + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanNV12; + pixelStride = 1; + break; + case formats::SRGGB10: + calcPixelMean = calcPixelMeanRAW10; + pixelStride = 2; + break; + default: + std::stringstream s; + s << "Unsupported Pixelformat " << formatInfo.name; + throw std::invalid_argument(s.str()); + } + + double sum = 0; + int w = 20; + int xs = streamConfig.size.width / 2 - w / 2; + int ys = streamConfig.size.height / 2 - w / 2; + + for (auto y = ys; y < ys + w; y++) { + auto line = data + y * streamConfig.stride; + for (auto x = xs; x < xs + w; x++) { + sum += calcPixelMean(line + x * pixelStride); + } + } + sum = sum / (w * w); + return sum; + } + } + return 0; +} + +TimeSheetEntry::TimeSheetEntry(const ControlIdMap &idmap) + : controls_(idmap) +{ +} + +void TimeSheetEntry::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous) +{ + metadata_ = request->metadata(); + + spotBrightness_ = calculateMeanBrightnessFromCenterSpot(request); + if (previous) { + brightnessChange_ = spotBrightness_ / previous->getSpotBrightness(); + } + sequence_ = request->sequence(); +} + +void TimeSheetEntry::printInfo() +{ + std::cout << "=== Frame " << sequence_ << std::endl; + std::cout << "Brightness: " << spotBrightness_ << std::endl; + + if (!metadata_.empty()) { + std::cout << "Metadata:" << std::endl; + auto idMap = metadata_.idMap(); + assert(idMap); + for (const auto &[id, value] : metadata_) { + std::cout << " " << idMap->at(id)->name() << " : " << value.toString() << std::endl; + } + } +} + +TimeSheetEntry &TimeSheet::get(size_t pos) +{ + auto &entry = entries_[pos]; + if (!entry) + entry = std::make_shared<TimeSheetEntry>(idmap_); + return *entry; +} + +void TimeSheet::prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence) +{ + request->controls() = get(sequence).controls(); +} + +void TimeSheet::handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request) +{ + uint32_t sequence = request->sequence(); + auto &entry = get(sequence); + TimeSheetEntry *previous = nullptr; + if (sequence >= 1) { + previous = entries_[sequence - 1].get(); + } + + entry.handleCompleteRequest(request, previous); +} + +void TimeSheet::printAllInfos() +{ + for (auto entry : entries_) { + if (entry) + entry->printInfo(); + } +} diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c155763c --- /dev/null +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas on Board Oy + * + * time_sheet.h + */ + +#pragma once + +#include <future> +#include <vector> + +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h> + +class TimeSheetEntry +{ +public: + TimeSheetEntry(const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap); + TimeSheetEntry(TimeSheetEntry &&other) noexcept = default; + TimeSheetEntry(const TimeSheetEntry &) = delete; + + libcamera::ControlList &controls() { return controls_; }; + libcamera::ControlList &metadata() { return metadata_; }; + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request, const TimeSheetEntry *previous); + void printInfo(); + double getSpotBrightness() const { return spotBrightness_; }; + double getBrightnessChange() const { return brightnessChange_; }; + +private: + double spotBrightness_ = 0.0; + double brightnessChange_ = 0.0; + libcamera::ControlList controls_; + libcamera::ControlList metadata_; + uint32_t sequence_ = 0; +}; + +class TimeSheet +{ +public: + TimeSheet(int count, const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap) + : idmap_(idmap), entries_(count){}; + + void prepareForQueue(libcamera::Request *request, uint32_t sequence); + void handleCompleteRequest(libcamera::Request *request); + void printAllInfos(); + + TimeSheetEntry &operator[](size_t pos) { return get(pos); }; + TimeSheetEntry &get(size_t pos); + +private: + const libcamera::ControlIdMap &idmap_; + std::vector<std::shared_ptr<TimeSheetEntry>> entries_; +};
These tests check if controls (only exposure time and analogue gain at the moment) get applied on the frame they were requested for. This is tested by looking at the metadata and additionally by calculating a mean brightness on a centered rect of 20x20 pixels. Until today, these tests where only run on a project specific branch with a modified simple pipeline. In theory they should pass on a current master :-) Current test setup: imx219 with simple pipeline on an imx8mp. Modifications of either the exposure delay or the gain delay in the camera_sensor class resulted in test failures. Which is exactly what this test shall proove. Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com> --- src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 39 ++++ src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 + src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 41 ++++ src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +- src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +- src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 135 +++++++++++ src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 53 +++++ 8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h