Message ID | 20190626173543.2257-1-niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series |
|
Related | show |
Hi Niklas, sorry, I didn't test on clang. It should become a standard practice since it's the default compiler used for building, ie, Cros.. On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 07:35:43PM +0200, Nklas Söderlund wrote: > Compiling with clang renders errors as a variable-sized arrays are not > allowed to be initialized, solve this by using memset() instead. > > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:155:37: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > ^~~~~ > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:156:36: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > ^~~~~ > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:227:37: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > ^~~~~ > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:228:36: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > ^~~~~ > Fixes: eb068f4e67eedacd ("libcamera: v4l2_device: Implement get and set controls") > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se> > --- > src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > index 84758a811c271976..d730df78e1ab2478 100644 > --- a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > +++ b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > @@ -152,8 +152,11 @@ int V4L2Device::getControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) > if (count == 0) > return 0; > > - const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > - struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > + const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count]; No need to zero this one. > + struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count]; We can initialize each entry as we walk them maybe? --- a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp +++ b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp @@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ int V4L2Device::getControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) if (count == 0) return 0; - const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; - struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; + const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count]; + struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count]; for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ++i) { const V4L2Control *ctrl = ctrls->getByIndex(i); const V4L2ControlInfo *info = getControlInfo(ctrl->id()); @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ int V4L2Device::getControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) } controlInfo[i] = info; + v4l2Ctrls[i] = {}; v4l2Ctrls[i].id = info->id(); } With the same to be done for setControl()? What do you think? > + memset(controlInfo, 0, count * sizeof(controlInfo[0])); > + memset(v4l2Ctrls, 0, count * sizeof(v4l2Ctrls[0])); > + > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ++i) { > const V4L2Control *ctrl = ctrls->getByIndex(i); > const V4L2ControlInfo *info = getControlInfo(ctrl->id()); > @@ -224,8 +227,10 @@ int V4L2Device::setControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) > if (count == 0) > return 0; > > - const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > - struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > + const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count]; > + struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count]; > + memset(controlInfo, 0, count * sizeof(controlInfo[0])); > + memset(v4l2Ctrls, 0, count * sizeof(v4l2Ctrls[0])); > > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ++i) { > const V4L2Control *ctrl = ctrls->getByIndex(i); > -- > 2.22.0 > > _______________________________________________ > libcamera-devel mailing list > libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org > https://lists.libcamera.org/listinfo/libcamera-devel
Hi Jacopo, On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 08:07:48AM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > Hi Niklas, > sorry, I didn't test on clang. It should become a standard practice > since it's the default compiler used for building, ie, Cros.. > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 07:35:43PM +0200, Nklas Söderlund wrote: > > Compiling with clang renders errors as a variable-sized arrays are not > > allowed to be initialized, solve this by using memset() instead. > > > > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:155:37: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > > const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > > ^~~~~ > > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:156:36: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > > struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > > ^~~~~ > > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:227:37: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > > const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > > ^~~~~ > > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:228:36: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > > struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > > ^~~~~ > > Fixes: eb068f4e67eedacd ("libcamera: v4l2_device: Implement get and set controls") > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se> > > --- > > src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp | 13 +++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > > index 84758a811c271976..d730df78e1ab2478 100644 > > --- a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > > +++ b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > > @@ -152,8 +152,11 @@ int V4L2Device::getControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) > > if (count == 0) > > return 0; > > > > - const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > > - struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > > + const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count]; > > No need to zero this one. > > > + struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count]; > > We can initialize each entry as we walk them maybe? > > --- a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > +++ b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > @@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ int V4L2Device::getControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) > if (count == 0) > return 0; > > - const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > - struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > + const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count]; > + struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count]; > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ++i) { > const V4L2Control *ctrl = ctrls->getByIndex(i); > const V4L2ControlInfo *info = getControlInfo(ctrl->id()); > @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ int V4L2Device::getControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) > } > > controlInfo[i] = info; > + v4l2Ctrls[i] = {}; > v4l2Ctrls[i].id = info->id(); > } > With the same to be done for setControl()? > > What do you think? Wouldn't a single memset be more efficient ? > > + memset(controlInfo, 0, count * sizeof(controlInfo[0])); > > + memset(v4l2Ctrls, 0, count * sizeof(v4l2Ctrls[0])); > > + > > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ++i) { > > const V4L2Control *ctrl = ctrls->getByIndex(i); > > const V4L2ControlInfo *info = getControlInfo(ctrl->id()); > > @@ -224,8 +227,10 @@ int V4L2Device::setControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) > > if (count == 0) > > return 0; > > > > - const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > > - struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > > + const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count]; > > + struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count]; > > + memset(controlInfo, 0, count * sizeof(controlInfo[0])); > > + memset(v4l2Ctrls, 0, count * sizeof(v4l2Ctrls[0])); > > > > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ++i) { > > const V4L2Control *ctrl = ctrls->getByIndex(i);
Hi Laurent, On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 03:34:52PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 08:07:48AM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > Hi Niklas, > > sorry, I didn't test on clang. It should become a standard practice > > since it's the default compiler used for building, ie, Cros.. > > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 07:35:43PM +0200, Nklas Söderlund wrote: > > > Compiling with clang renders errors as a variable-sized arrays are not > > > allowed to be initialized, solve this by using memset() instead. > > > > > > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:155:37: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > > > const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > > > ^~~~~ > > > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:156:36: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > > > struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > > > ^~~~~ > > > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:227:37: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > > > const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > > > ^~~~~ > > > ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:228:36: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized > > > struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > > > ^~~~~ > > > Fixes: eb068f4e67eedacd ("libcamera: v4l2_device: Implement get and set controls") > > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se> > > > --- > > > src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp | 13 +++++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > > > index 84758a811c271976..d730df78e1ab2478 100644 > > > --- a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > > > +++ b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > > > @@ -152,8 +152,11 @@ int V4L2Device::getControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) > > > if (count == 0) > > > return 0; > > > > > > - const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > > > - struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > > > + const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count]; > > > > No need to zero this one. > > > > > + struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count]; > > > > We can initialize each entry as we walk them maybe? > > > > --- a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > > +++ b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp > > @@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ int V4L2Device::getControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) > > if (count == 0) > > return 0; > > > > - const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > > - struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > > + const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count]; > > + struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count]; > > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ++i) { > > const V4L2Control *ctrl = ctrls->getByIndex(i); > > const V4L2ControlInfo *info = getControlInfo(ctrl->id()); > > @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ int V4L2Device::getControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) > > } > > > > controlInfo[i] = info; > > + v4l2Ctrls[i] = {}; > > v4l2Ctrls[i].id = info->id(); > > } > > With the same to be done for setControl()? > > > > What do you think? > > Wouldn't a single memset be more efficient ? Probably yes, as we need to walk all entries anyway. > > > > + memset(controlInfo, 0, count * sizeof(controlInfo[0])); > > > + memset(v4l2Ctrls, 0, count * sizeof(v4l2Ctrls[0])); > > > + > > > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ++i) { > > > const V4L2Control *ctrl = ctrls->getByIndex(i); > > > const V4L2ControlInfo *info = getControlInfo(ctrl->id()); > > > @@ -224,8 +227,10 @@ int V4L2Device::setControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) > > > if (count == 0) > > > return 0; > > > > > > - const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; > > > - struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; > > > + const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count]; > > > + struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count]; > > > + memset(controlInfo, 0, count * sizeof(controlInfo[0])); > > > + memset(v4l2Ctrls, 0, count * sizeof(v4l2Ctrls[0])); > > > > > > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ++i) { > > > const V4L2Control *ctrl = ctrls->getByIndex(i); > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart
diff --git a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp index 84758a811c271976..d730df78e1ab2478 100644 --- a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp +++ b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp @@ -152,8 +152,11 @@ int V4L2Device::getControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) if (count == 0) return 0; - const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; - struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; + const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count]; + struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count]; + memset(controlInfo, 0, count * sizeof(controlInfo[0])); + memset(v4l2Ctrls, 0, count * sizeof(v4l2Ctrls[0])); + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ++i) { const V4L2Control *ctrl = ctrls->getByIndex(i); const V4L2ControlInfo *info = getControlInfo(ctrl->id()); @@ -224,8 +227,10 @@ int V4L2Device::setControls(V4L2ControlList *ctrls) if (count == 0) return 0; - const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; - struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; + const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count]; + struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count]; + memset(controlInfo, 0, count * sizeof(controlInfo[0])); + memset(v4l2Ctrls, 0, count * sizeof(v4l2Ctrls[0])); for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ++i) { const V4L2Control *ctrl = ctrls->getByIndex(i);
Compiling with clang renders errors as a variable-sized arrays are not allowed to be initialized, solve this by using memset() instead. ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:155:37: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; ^~~~~ ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:156:36: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; ^~~~~ ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:227:37: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized const V4L2ControlInfo *controlInfo[count] = {}; ^~~~~ ../../src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp:228:36: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized struct v4l2_ext_control v4l2Ctrls[count] = {}; ^~~~~ Fixes: eb068f4e67eedacd ("libcamera: v4l2_device: Implement get and set controls") Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se> --- src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)