Message ID | 20231230162912.827669-6-jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series |
|
Related | show |
Quoting Jacopo Mondi via libcamera-devel (2023-12-30 16:29:10) > Test for mandatory controls and properties to be supported by > a Camera. > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com> > --- > src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 1 + > .../lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp | 98 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp > > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > index ae8c6f4db51b..c927dd12e9f4 100644 > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ > 'helpers/capture.cpp', > 'main.cpp', > 'tests/capture_test.cpp', > + 'tests/controls_test.cpp' > ]) > > lc_compliance_includes = ([ > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..e9bdf6fdb7e3 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp > @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2023, Ideas On Board Oy > + * > + * controls_test.cpp - Test controls and properties > + */ > + > +#include <array> > +#include <iostream> > + > +#include <libcamera/control_ids.h> > +#include <libcamera/controls.h> > +#include <libcamera/property_ids.h> > + > +#include <gtest/gtest.h> > + > +#include "environment.h" > + > +using namespace libcamera; > + > +std::array<const ControlIdMap *, 2> controlMaps = { > + &controls::controls, > + &properties::properties, > +}; > + > +class ControlTest : public testing::TestWithParam<const ControlIdMap *> > +{ > +public: > + static std::string nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo<ControlTest::ParamType> &info); > + > +protected: > + void SetUp() override; > + void TearDown() override; > + > + std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera_; > +}; > + > +void ControlTest::SetUp() > +{ > + Environment *env = Environment::get(); > + > + camera_ = env->cm()->get(env->cameraId()); > + > + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->acquire(), 0); > +} > + > +void ControlTest::TearDown() > +{ > + if (!camera_) > + return; > + > + camera_->release(); > + camera_.reset(); > +} > + > +std::string ControlTest::nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo<ControlTest::ParamType> &info) > +{ > + const ControlIdMap *idMap = info.param; > + if (idMap == &controls::controls) > + return "controls"; > + else if (idMap == &properties::properties) > + return "properties"; > + > + return "vendor"; > +} > + > +/* Test that mandatory controls and properties are supported by a camera. */ > +TEST_P(ControlTest, RequiredControls) > +{ > + auto controlMap = GetParam(); > + > + for (const auto &[id, ctrl] : *controlMap) { > + if (!ctrl->required()) > + continue; > + > + if (controlMap == &controls::controls) { > + const auto it = camera_->controls().find(ctrl); > + > + if (it == camera_->controls().end()) > + FAIL() << "Mandatory control \"" << ctrl->name() > + << "\" not supported" << std::endl; > + } else if (controlMap == &properties::properties) { > + bool found = camera_->properties().contains(id); > + > + if (!found) > + FAIL() << "Mandatory property \"" << ctrl->name() > + << "\" not supported" << std::endl; > + } > + } > +} > + > +/* > + * Use a Value-Parametrized Test case so that vendors can easily test vendor > + * control lists by expading 'controlMaps'. > + */ s/expading/expanding/ Where does this happen? I can't see a list of mandatory controls in this test. Are any vendor controls even possible to be made Mandatory? I can't see how vendor controls could be mandatory because they couldn't apply to all cameras... > +INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(ControlsTest, ControlTest, > + testing::ValuesIn(controlMaps), > + ControlTest::nameParameters); > -- > 2.41.0 >
Hi Kieran On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:56:04AM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote: > Quoting Jacopo Mondi via libcamera-devel (2023-12-30 16:29:10) > > Test for mandatory controls and properties to be supported by > > a Camera. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com> > > --- > > src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 1 + > > .../lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp | 98 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp > > > > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > > index ae8c6f4db51b..c927dd12e9f4 100644 > > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ > > 'helpers/capture.cpp', > > 'main.cpp', > > 'tests/capture_test.cpp', > > + 'tests/controls_test.cpp' > > ]) > > > > lc_compliance_includes = ([ > > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..e9bdf6fdb7e3 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp > > @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > > +/* > > + * Copyright (C) 2023, Ideas On Board Oy > > + * > > + * controls_test.cpp - Test controls and properties > > + */ > > + > > +#include <array> > > +#include <iostream> > > + > > +#include <libcamera/control_ids.h> > > +#include <libcamera/controls.h> > > +#include <libcamera/property_ids.h> > > + > > +#include <gtest/gtest.h> > > + > > +#include "environment.h" > > + > > +using namespace libcamera; > > + > > +std::array<const ControlIdMap *, 2> controlMaps = { > > + &controls::controls, > > + &properties::properties, > > +}; > > + > > +class ControlTest : public testing::TestWithParam<const ControlIdMap *> > > +{ > > +public: > > + static std::string nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo<ControlTest::ParamType> &info); > > + > > +protected: > > + void SetUp() override; > > + void TearDown() override; > > + > > + std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera_; > > +}; > > + > > +void ControlTest::SetUp() > > +{ > > + Environment *env = Environment::get(); > > + > > + camera_ = env->cm()->get(env->cameraId()); > > + > > + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->acquire(), 0); > > +} > > + > > +void ControlTest::TearDown() > > +{ > > + if (!camera_) > > + return; > > + > > + camera_->release(); > > + camera_.reset(); > > +} > > + > > +std::string ControlTest::nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo<ControlTest::ParamType> &info) > > +{ > > + const ControlIdMap *idMap = info.param; > > + if (idMap == &controls::controls) > > + return "controls"; > > + else if (idMap == &properties::properties) > > + return "properties"; > > + > > + return "vendor"; > > +} > > + > > +/* Test that mandatory controls and properties are supported by a camera. */ > > +TEST_P(ControlTest, RequiredControls) > > +{ > > + auto controlMap = GetParam(); > > + > > + for (const auto &[id, ctrl] : *controlMap) { > > + if (!ctrl->required()) > > + continue; > > + > > + if (controlMap == &controls::controls) { > > + const auto it = camera_->controls().find(ctrl); > > + > > + if (it == camera_->controls().end()) > > + FAIL() << "Mandatory control \"" << ctrl->name() > > + << "\" not supported" << std::endl; > > + } else if (controlMap == &properties::properties) { > > + bool found = camera_->properties().contains(id); > > + > > + if (!found) > > + FAIL() << "Mandatory property \"" << ctrl->name() > > + << "\" not supported" << std::endl; > > + } > > + } > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * Use a Value-Parametrized Test case so that vendors can easily test vendor > > + * control lists by expading 'controlMaps'. > > + */ > > s/expading/expanding/ > > > Where does this happen? I can't see a list of mandatory controls in this > test. Are any vendor controls even possible to be made Mandatory? I The series is based on "[PATCH 0/2] libcamera: Add support for required controls" where mandatory controls and properties are flagged in the controls/property definition itself > can't see how vendor controls could be mandatory because they couldn't > apply to all cameras... No, but the comment was there to explain why I chose to go for Value-Parametrized test. I could have simply iterated tests on controls::controls and properties::properties, but using 'controlMaps' a vendor can easily add its own properties/control vector there. The use case I was thinking about is mostly to validate properties and controls that comes from a sensor, not the ph as vendors are in control of it. > > > > > +INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(ControlsTest, ControlTest, > > + testing::ValuesIn(controlMaps), > > + ControlTest::nameParameters); > > -- > > 2.41.0 > >
diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build index ae8c6f4db51b..c927dd12e9f4 100644 --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ lc_compliance_sources = files([ 'helpers/capture.cpp', 'main.cpp', 'tests/capture_test.cpp', + 'tests/controls_test.cpp' ]) lc_compliance_includes = ([ diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e9bdf6fdb7e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2023, Ideas On Board Oy + * + * controls_test.cpp - Test controls and properties + */ + +#include <array> +#include <iostream> + +#include <libcamera/control_ids.h> +#include <libcamera/controls.h> +#include <libcamera/property_ids.h> + +#include <gtest/gtest.h> + +#include "environment.h" + +using namespace libcamera; + +std::array<const ControlIdMap *, 2> controlMaps = { + &controls::controls, + &properties::properties, +}; + +class ControlTest : public testing::TestWithParam<const ControlIdMap *> +{ +public: + static std::string nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo<ControlTest::ParamType> &info); + +protected: + void SetUp() override; + void TearDown() override; + + std::shared_ptr<Camera> camera_; +}; + +void ControlTest::SetUp() +{ + Environment *env = Environment::get(); + + camera_ = env->cm()->get(env->cameraId()); + + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->acquire(), 0); +} + +void ControlTest::TearDown() +{ + if (!camera_) + return; + + camera_->release(); + camera_.reset(); +} + +std::string ControlTest::nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo<ControlTest::ParamType> &info) +{ + const ControlIdMap *idMap = info.param; + if (idMap == &controls::controls) + return "controls"; + else if (idMap == &properties::properties) + return "properties"; + + return "vendor"; +} + +/* Test that mandatory controls and properties are supported by a camera. */ +TEST_P(ControlTest, RequiredControls) +{ + auto controlMap = GetParam(); + + for (const auto &[id, ctrl] : *controlMap) { + if (!ctrl->required()) + continue; + + if (controlMap == &controls::controls) { + const auto it = camera_->controls().find(ctrl); + + if (it == camera_->controls().end()) + FAIL() << "Mandatory control \"" << ctrl->name() + << "\" not supported" << std::endl; + } else if (controlMap == &properties::properties) { + bool found = camera_->properties().contains(id); + + if (!found) + FAIL() << "Mandatory property \"" << ctrl->name() + << "\" not supported" << std::endl; + } + } +} + +/* + * Use a Value-Parametrized Test case so that vendors can easily test vendor + * control lists by expading 'controlMaps'. + */ +INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(ControlsTest, ControlTest, + testing::ValuesIn(controlMaps), + ControlTest::nameParameters);
Test for mandatory controls and properties to be supported by a Camera. Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com> --- src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 1 + .../lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp | 98 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/controls_test.cpp