Show a cover letter.

GET /api/covers/12298/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 12298,
    "url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/covers/12298/?format=api",
    "web_url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/cover/12298/",
    "project": {
        "id": 1,
        "url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/projects/1/?format=api",
        "name": "libcamera",
        "link_name": "libcamera",
        "list_id": "libcamera_core",
        "list_email": "libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org",
        "web_url": "",
        "scm_url": "",
        "webscm_url": ""
    },
    "msgid": "<20210515040511.23294-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>",
    "date": "2021-05-15T04:05:07",
    "name": "[libcamera-devel,v2,0/4] libcamera: Simplify range-based for loop counters",
    "submitter": {
        "id": 2,
        "url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/people/2/?format=api",
        "name": "Laurent Pinchart",
        "email": "laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com"
    },
    "mbox": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/cover/12298/mbox/",
    "series": [
        {
            "id": 2032,
            "url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/series/2032/?format=api",
            "web_url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/project/libcamera/list/?series=2032",
            "date": "2021-05-15T04:05:07",
            "name": "libcamera: Simplify range-based for loop counters",
            "version": 2,
            "mbox": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/series/2032/mbox/"
        }
    ],
    "comments": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/covers/12298/comments/",
    "headers": {
        "Return-Path": "<libcamera-devel-bounces@lists.libcamera.org>",
        "X-Original-To": "parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org",
        "Delivered-To": "parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org",
        "Received": [
            "from lancelot.ideasonboard.com (lancelot.ideasonboard.com\n\t[92.243.16.209])\n\tby patchwork.libcamera.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF81DC31F6\n\tfor <parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org>;\n\tSat, 15 May 2021 04:05:26 +0000 (UTC)",
            "from lancelot.ideasonboard.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])\n\tby lancelot.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E6A6891B;\n\tSat, 15 May 2021 06:05:26 +0200 (CEST)",
            "from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com\n\t[213.167.242.64])\n\tby lancelot.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C84C6602B3\n\tfor <libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org>;\n\tSat, 15 May 2021 06:05:24 +0200 (CEST)",
            "from pendragon.lan (62-78-145-57.bb.dnainternet.fi [62.78.145.57])\n\tby perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7F3C6EE\n\tfor <libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org>;\n\tSat, 15 May 2021 06:05:23 +0200 (CEST)"
        ],
        "Authentication-Results": "lancelot.ideasonboard.com;\n\tdkim=fail reason=\"signature verification failed\" (1024-bit key;\n\tunprotected) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com\n\theader.b=\"GZYCEBJR\"; dkim-atps=neutral",
        "DKIM-Signature": "v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com;\n\ts=mail; t=1621051523;\n\tbh=JSywPDHgP+6LbEptXbuENmskKBy3+SuD9uN2eHHuO9E=;\n\th=From:To:Subject:Date:From;\n\tb=GZYCEBJRzytbursSq3Q5mnh70lmPOyxtFjzUZCSVLaS4mwAydC6SyCz5PF8m+gdIn\n\tWosasKJNPg+jNbFEalONgrzapLQYMHf27aTmoXHe1f8KaM+NC/PJbWeK8AL3MvgjTW\n\tIYwYlVGvPfgwV0mjkF+iCk2FFf6hEPmRik2mVMWQ=",
        "From": "Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>",
        "To": "libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org",
        "Date": "Sat, 15 May 2021 07:05:07 +0300",
        "Message-Id": "<20210515040511.23294-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>",
        "X-Mailer": "git-send-email 2.28.1",
        "MIME-Version": "1.0",
        "Subject": "[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] libcamera: Simplify range-based\n\tfor loop counters",
        "X-BeenThere": "libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org",
        "X-Mailman-Version": "2.1.29",
        "Precedence": "list",
        "List-Id": "<libcamera-devel.lists.libcamera.org>",
        "List-Unsubscribe": "<https://lists.libcamera.org/options/libcamera-devel>,\n\t<mailto:libcamera-devel-request@lists.libcamera.org?subject=unsubscribe>",
        "List-Archive": "<https://lists.libcamera.org/pipermail/libcamera-devel/>",
        "List-Post": "<mailto:libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org>",
        "List-Help": "<mailto:libcamera-devel-request@lists.libcamera.org?subject=help>",
        "List-Subscribe": "<https://lists.libcamera.org/listinfo/libcamera-devel>,\n\t<mailto:libcamera-devel-request@lists.libcamera.org?subject=subscribe>",
        "Content-Type": "text/plain; charset=\"us-ascii\"",
        "Content-Transfer-Encoding": "7bit",
        "Errors-To": "libcamera-devel-bounces@lists.libcamera.org",
        "Sender": "\"libcamera-devel\" <libcamera-devel-bounces@lists.libcamera.org>"
    },
    "content": "Hello,\n\nThis patch series simplifies for loops that iterate over a range and\nrequire a loop counter. v1 was sent as an RFC, and as it was positively\nreceived, v2 graduates to a normal series.\n\nThe limitation of the range-based for loop is explained in patch 1/4,\nwhich provides a new utils::enumerate() function to solve the problem.\nThe API is inspired by the C++23 views::enumerate proposal\n(http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p2164r1.pdf),\nbut implemented without the range library as that's a C++20 feature.\n\nPatch 2/4 is an example of how code can be simplified. It also outlines\na limitation of the API. Due to the C++ lifetime rules, we can't safely\npass a temporary to utils::enumerate() as the temporary would be\ndestroyed once utils::enumerate() returns but before the for loop\ncompletes (actually before it even starts), resulting in use-after-free\nerrors. The issue is explained in more details in\nhttp://josuttis.com/download/std/D2012R0_fix_rangebasedfor_201029.pdf.\nThe ensure that such bugs can't be introduced by mistake, the\nutils::enumerate() function takes an lvalue reference only. The drawback\nis that a loop that iterates over a temporary must now stores that\ntemporary in a named variable before the loop. On a side note, C++20\nwould bring us a workaround to declare that variable within the loop\nstatement. If anyone can think of a clever idea to fix this problem, I'm\nall ears. One option may be to store a copy of the iterable in the\nadapter when utils::enumerate() is given an rvalue, possibly with move\nsemantics, but it may still be costly in some cases, I'm not sure how\ncompilers would optimize that.\n\nPatch 3/4 provides an alternative API that uses an aggregate with named\nfields instead of an std::pair with structured binding, with patch 4/4\nadapting the example for 2/4 accordingly. There seems to be a preference\nfor the structured bindings, which means that 3/4 and 4/4 are likely to\nbe dropped. If they however end up being accepted after changes of mind,\nI'll squash them with 1/4 and 2/4 respectively.\n\nLaurent Pinchart (4):\n  libcamera: utils: Add enumerate view for range-based for loops\n  v4l2: Replace manual loop counters with utils::enumerate()\n  libcamera: utils: enumerate: Use named fields for result\n  v4l2: Adapt to utils::enumerate() usage of named fields\n\n include/libcamera/internal/utils.h | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++\n src/libcamera/utils.cpp            | 30 ++++++++++\n src/v4l2/v4l2_compat_manager.cpp   | 18 +++---\n test/utils.cpp                     | 59 +++++++++++++++++++\n 4 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)"
}