Show a patch.

GET /api/1.1/patches/13568/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 13568,
    "url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/1.1/patches/13568/?format=api",
    "web_url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/patch/13568/",
    "project": {
        "id": 1,
        "url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/1.1/projects/1/?format=api",
        "name": "libcamera",
        "link_name": "libcamera",
        "list_id": "libcamera_core",
        "list_email": "libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org",
        "web_url": "",
        "scm_url": "",
        "webscm_url": ""
    },
    "msgid": "<20210830082150.42514-5-umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>",
    "date": "2021-08-30T08:21:50",
    "name": "[libcamera-devel,v3,4/4] ipu3: cio2: Tweak sensor size selection policy",
    "commit_ref": null,
    "pull_url": null,
    "state": "accepted",
    "archived": false,
    "hash": "c4b311c9cb9c0f30368cbe74bcc85b5d4d896287",
    "submitter": {
        "id": 86,
        "url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/1.1/people/86/?format=api",
        "name": "Umang Jain",
        "email": "umang.jain@ideasonboard.com"
    },
    "delegate": {
        "id": 12,
        "url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/1.1/users/12/?format=api",
        "username": "uajain",
        "first_name": "Umang",
        "last_name": "Jain",
        "email": "umang.jain@ideasonboard.com"
    },
    "mbox": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/patch/13568/mbox/",
    "series": [
        {
            "id": 2420,
            "url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/1.1/series/2420/?format=api",
            "web_url": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/project/libcamera/list/?series=2420",
            "date": "2021-08-30T08:21:46",
            "name": "ipu3: Change sensor size selection policy",
            "version": 3,
            "mbox": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/series/2420/mbox/"
        }
    ],
    "comments": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/patches/13568/comments/",
    "check": "pending",
    "checks": "https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/patches/13568/checks/",
    "tags": {},
    "headers": {
        "Return-Path": "<libcamera-devel-bounces@lists.libcamera.org>",
        "X-Original-To": "parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org",
        "Delivered-To": "parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org",
        "Received": [
            "from lancelot.ideasonboard.com (lancelot.ideasonboard.com\n\t[92.243.16.209])\n\tby patchwork.libcamera.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B3FC3244\n\tfor <parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org>;\n\tMon, 30 Aug 2021 08:22:07 +0000 (UTC)",
            "from lancelot.ideasonboard.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])\n\tby lancelot.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15976916A;\n\tMon, 30 Aug 2021 10:22:06 +0200 (CEST)",
            "from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com\n\t[IPv6:2001:4b98:dc2:55:216:3eff:fef7:d647])\n\tby lancelot.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C65FB6916B\n\tfor <libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org>;\n\tMon, 30 Aug 2021 10:22:04 +0200 (CEST)",
            "from perceval.ideasonboard.com (unknown [103.251.226.0])\n\tby perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 826D53D7;\n\tMon, 30 Aug 2021 10:22:03 +0200 (CEST)"
        ],
        "Authentication-Results": "lancelot.ideasonboard.com;\n\tdkim=fail reason=\"signature verification failed\" (1024-bit key;\n\tunprotected) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com\n\theader.b=\"SmTlEqMx\"; dkim-atps=neutral",
        "DKIM-Signature": "v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com;\n\ts=mail; t=1630311724;\n\tbh=DZdOO9d+1tL1RprFAb1NXD1KQHyteYGkEn2egEwHcaI=;\n\th=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;\n\tb=SmTlEqMx8MeKAxGw2mO+iD7j6W5ahnHTWXLIT/x9JfitMQgfq/6QFuObxOLfRZGzy\n\thkmMvVC96IecP9dC37PYQxYei6GCPZUrpajPBB+bhRgWKfcGMaHnlzlBmGHgzRBYzg\n\tXiGGb/QD+4jo2cKvP4y/WQb/rClf/mFV77EI5lgQ=",
        "From": "Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>",
        "To": "libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org",
        "Date": "Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:51:50 +0530",
        "Message-Id": "<20210830082150.42514-5-umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>",
        "X-Mailer": "git-send-email 2.31.1",
        "In-Reply-To": "<20210830082150.42514-1-umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>",
        "References": "<20210830082150.42514-1-umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>",
        "MIME-Version": "1.0",
        "Content-Transfer-Encoding": "8bit",
        "Subject": "[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] ipu3: cio2: Tweak sensor size\n\tselection policy",
        "X-BeenThere": "libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org",
        "X-Mailman-Version": "2.1.29",
        "Precedence": "list",
        "List-Id": "<libcamera-devel.lists.libcamera.org>",
        "List-Unsubscribe": "<https://lists.libcamera.org/options/libcamera-devel>,\n\t<mailto:libcamera-devel-request@lists.libcamera.org?subject=unsubscribe>",
        "List-Archive": "<https://lists.libcamera.org/pipermail/libcamera-devel/>",
        "List-Post": "<mailto:libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org>",
        "List-Help": "<mailto:libcamera-devel-request@lists.libcamera.org?subject=help>",
        "List-Subscribe": "<https://lists.libcamera.org/listinfo/libcamera-devel>,\n\t<mailto:libcamera-devel-request@lists.libcamera.org?subject=subscribe>",
        "Errors-To": "libcamera-devel-bounces@lists.libcamera.org",
        "Sender": "\"libcamera-devel\" <libcamera-devel-bounces@lists.libcamera.org>"
    },
    "content": "Do not compare higher precision of the ratios, as it might lead to\nabsurd selection of sensor size for a relatively low requested\nresolution size.\n\nFor example:\nThe imx258 driver supports the following sensor resolutions:\n\n - 4208x3118 = 1.349583066\n - 2104x1560 = 1.348717949\n - 1048x780  = 1.343589744\n\nIt can be inferred that, that the aspect ratio only differs by a small\nfactor with each other. It does not makes sense to select a 4208x3118\nfor a requested size of say 640x480 or 1280x720, which is what is\nhappening currently.\n($) cam -c1 -swidth=640,height=480,role=raw\n    - CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\n\nIn order to address this constraint, only compare the ratio with single\nprecision to make a better decision on the sensor resolution policy\nselection.\n\n($) cam -c1 -srole=raw,width=640,height=480\n    - CIO2 configuration: 1048x780-SGRBG10_IPU3\n\nSigned-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>\nTested-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>\nReviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>\nReviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>\n---\n src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.cpp | 8 ++++++++\n 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)",
    "diff": "diff --git a/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.cpp b/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.cpp\nindex ceaf665e..9cedcb5b 100644\n--- a/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.cpp\n+++ b/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.cpp\n@@ -295,6 +295,14 @@ V4L2SubdeviceFormat CIO2Device::getSensorFormat(const std::vector<unsigned int>\n \t\t\t\tcontinue;\n \n \t\t\tfloat ratio = static_cast<float>(sz.width) / sz.height;\n+\t\t\t/*\n+\t\t\t * Ratios can differ by small mantissa difference which\n+\t\t\t * can affect the selection of the sensor output size\n+\t\t\t * wildly. We are interested in selection of the closest\n+\t\t\t * size with respect to the desired output size, hence\n+\t\t\t * comparing it with a single precision digit is enough.\n+\t\t\t */\n+\t\t\tratio = static_cast<unsigned int>(ratio * 10) / 10.0;\n \t\t\tfloat ratioDiff = fabsf(ratio - desiredRatio);\n \t\t\tunsigned int area = sz.width * sz.height;\n \t\t\tunsigned int areaDiff = area - desiredArea;\n",
    "prefixes": [
        "libcamera-devel",
        "v3",
        "4/4"
    ]
}