[{"id":33312,"web_url":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/comment/33312/","msgid":"","date":"2025-02-06T17:24:42","subject":"Re: [RFC PATCH v3 18/21] apps: lc-compliance: Add multi-stream tests","submitter":{"id":143,"url":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/people/143/","name":"Jacopo Mondi","email":"jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com"},"content":"Hi Barnabás\n\nOn Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:51:35AM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:\n> Rename the `SingleStream` test to `SimpleCapture`, and extend it\n> to support using multiple roles. And instantiate another test suite\n\ns/And instantiate/instantiate/\n\n> from the `SimpleCapture` test that tests multiple streams in one\n> capture session.\n>\n> Co-developed-by: Jacopo Mondi \n> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi \n> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Pőcze \n> Reviewed-by: Paul Elder \n> ---\n> src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/capture_test.cpp | 85 +++++++++++--------\n> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)\n>\n> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/capture_test.cpp\n> index 147e17019..db1d52fc9 100644\n> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/capture_test.cpp\n> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/capture_test.cpp\n> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@\n>\n> #include \"capture.h\"\n>\n> -#include \n> +#include \n>\n> #include \n>\n> @@ -18,19 +18,10 @@ namespace {\n>\n> using namespace libcamera;\n>\n> -const int NUMREQUESTS[] = { 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89 };\n> -\n> -const StreamRole ROLES[] = {\n> -\tStreamRole::Raw,\n> -\tStreamRole::StillCapture,\n> -\tStreamRole::VideoRecording,\n> -\tStreamRole::Viewfinder\n> -};\n> -\n> -class SingleStream : public testing::TestWithParam>\n> +class SimpleCapture : public testing::TestWithParam, int>>\n\n#include \n#include \n\nvector should probably be included in capture.h\n\n\n> {\n> public:\n> -\tstatic std::string nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo &info);\n> +\tstatic std::string nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo &info);\n\nwas\n#include \n\nmissing ?\n\n>\n> protected:\n> \tvoid SetUp() override;\n> @@ -43,7 +34,7 @@ protected:\n> * We use gtest's SetUp() and TearDown() instead of constructor and destructor\n> * in order to be able to assert on them.\n> */\n> -void SingleStream::SetUp()\n> +void SimpleCapture::SetUp()\n> {\n> \tEnvironment *env = Environment::get();\n>\n> @@ -52,7 +43,7 @@ void SingleStream::SetUp()\n> \tASSERT_EQ(camera_->acquire(), 0);\n> }\n>\n> -void SingleStream::TearDown()\n> +void SimpleCapture::TearDown()\n> {\n> \tif (!camera_)\n> \t\treturn;\n> @@ -61,19 +52,17 @@ void SingleStream::TearDown()\n> \tcamera_.reset();\n> }\n>\n> -std::string SingleStream::nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo &info)\n> +std::string SimpleCapture::nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo &info)\n> {\n> -\tstd::map rolesMap = {\n> -\t\t{ StreamRole::Raw, \"Raw\" },\n> -\t\t{ StreamRole::StillCapture, \"StillCapture\" },\n> -\t\t{ StreamRole::VideoRecording, \"VideoRecording\" },\n> -\t\t{ StreamRole::Viewfinder, \"Viewfinder\" }\n> -\t};\n> +\tconst auto &[roles, numRequests] = info.param;\n> +\tstd::ostringstream ss;\n>\n> -\tstd::string roleName = rolesMap[std::get<0>(info.param)];\n> -\tstd::string numRequestsName = std::to_string(std::get<1>(info.param));\n> +\tfor (StreamRole r : roles)\n> +\t\tss << r << '_';\n>\n> -\treturn roleName + \"_\" + numRequestsName;\n> +\tss << '_' << numRequests;\n> +\n> +\treturn std::move(ss).str();\n\nDoes moving ss make any difference here ?\n\nThis apart\nReviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi \n\nThanks\n j\n\n> }\n>\n> /*\n> @@ -83,13 +72,13 @@ std::string SingleStream::nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo * failure is a camera that completes less requests than the number of requests\n> * queued.\n> */\n> -TEST_P(SingleStream, Capture)\n> +TEST_P(SimpleCapture, Capture)\n> {\n> -\tauto [role, numRequests] = GetParam();\n> +\tconst auto &[roles, numRequests] = GetParam();\n>\n> \tCapture capture(camera_);\n>\n> -\tcapture.configure(std::array{ role });\n> +\tcapture.configure(roles);\n>\n> \tcapture.run(numRequests, numRequests);\n> }\n> @@ -101,14 +90,14 @@ TEST_P(SingleStream, Capture)\n> * a camera that does not clean up correctly in its error path but is only\n> * tested by single-capture applications.\n> */\n> -TEST_P(SingleStream, CaptureStartStop)\n> +TEST_P(SimpleCapture, CaptureStartStop)\n> {\n> -\tauto [role, numRequests] = GetParam();\n> +\tconst auto &[roles, numRequests] = GetParam();\n> \tunsigned int numRepeats = 3;\n>\n> \tCapture capture(camera_);\n>\n> -\tcapture.configure(std::array{ role });\n> +\tcapture.configure(roles);\n>\n> \tfor (unsigned int starts = 0; starts < numRepeats; starts++)\n> \t\tcapture.run(numRequests, numRequests);\n> @@ -121,21 +110,43 @@ TEST_P(SingleStream, CaptureStartStop)\n> * is a camera that does not handle cancelation of buffers coming back from the\n> * video device while stopping.\n> */\n> -TEST_P(SingleStream, UnbalancedStop)\n> +TEST_P(SimpleCapture, UnbalancedStop)\n> {\n> -\tauto [role, numRequests] = GetParam();\n> +\tconst auto &[roles, numRequests] = GetParam();\n>\n> \tCapture capture(camera_);\n>\n> -\tcapture.configure(std::array{ role });\n> +\tcapture.configure(roles);\n>\n> \tcapture.run(numRequests);\n> }\n>\n> -INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests,\n> -\t\t\t SingleStream,\n> -\t\t\t testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES),\n> +const int NUMREQUESTS[] = { 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89 };\n> +\n> +const std::vector SINGLEROLES[] = {\n> +\t{ StreamRole::Raw, },\n> +\t{ StreamRole::StillCapture, },\n> +\t{ StreamRole::VideoRecording, },\n> +\t{ StreamRole::Viewfinder, },\n> +};\n> +\n> +const std::vector MULTIROLES[] = {\n> +\t{ StreamRole::Raw, StreamRole::StillCapture },\n> +\t{ StreamRole::Raw, StreamRole::VideoRecording },\n> +\t{ StreamRole::StillCapture, StreamRole::VideoRecording },\n> +\t{ StreamRole::VideoRecording, StreamRole::VideoRecording },\n> +};\n> +\n> +INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(SingleStream,\n> +\t\t\t SimpleCapture,\n> +\t\t\t testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(SINGLEROLES),\n> +\t\t\t\t\t testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)),\n> +\t\t\t SimpleCapture::nameParameters);\n> +\n> +INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(MultiStream,\n> +\t\t\t SimpleCapture,\n> +\t\t\t testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(MULTIROLES),\n> \t\t\t\t\t testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)),\n> -\t\t\t SingleStream::nameParameters);\n> +\t\t\t SimpleCapture::nameParameters);\n>\n> } /* namespace */\n> --\n> 2.48.1\n>\n>","headers":{"Return-Path":"","X-Original-To":"parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org","Delivered-To":"parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org","Received":["from lancelot.ideasonboard.com (lancelot.ideasonboard.com\n\t[92.243.16.209])\n\tby patchwork.libcamera.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31CBDC32EA\n\tfor ;\n\tThu, 6 Feb 2025 17:24:52 +0000 (UTC)","from lancelot.ideasonboard.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])\n\tby lancelot.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F4B685F5;\n\tThu, 6 Feb 2025 18:24:51 +0100 (CET)","from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com\n\t[IPv6:2001:4b98:dc2:55:216:3eff:fef7:d647])\n\tby lancelot.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35CFF6053F\n\tfor ;\n\tThu, 6 Feb 2025 18:24:50 +0100 (CET)","from ideasonboard.com (mob-5-90-139-204.net.vodafone.it\n\t[5.90.139.204])\n\tby perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 938D31198;\n\tThu, 6 Feb 2025 18:23:35 +0100 (CET)"],"Authentication-Results":"lancelot.ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key;\n\tunprotected) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com\n\theader.b=\"sEvzqiQd\"; dkim-atps=neutral","DKIM-Signature":"v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com;\n\ts=mail; t=1738862616;\n\tbh=Oi8BIUhxWGUGmLjWftOjf8Ap1l8fzfwhM4hyqvo0gwk=;\n\th=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;\n\tb=sEvzqiQd33S0nnnX7CwQ7+HcYQkRlXgY/wBHux3NJuUKRna9xYww9Ct8gqZ/ETPcN\n\tJTD1lEhif8zZGAmMmkzJlm8viQ6AyvpP4FzI1j0STkaC9ytk4reVzu7q2l7BHZXk62\n\tdIbahCOhl+OOMljFosS6TlTPd+vbPLdTBenZOjXs=","Date":"Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:24:42 +0100","From":"Jacopo Mondi ","To":"=?utf-8?q?Barnab=C3=A1s_P=C5=91cze?= ","Cc":"libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org, \n\tJacopo Mondi ,\n\tPaul Elder ","Subject":"Re: [RFC PATCH v3 18/21] apps: lc-compliance: Add multi-stream tests","Message-ID":"","References":"<20250130115001.1129305-1-pobrn@protonmail.com>\n\t<20250130115001.1129305-19-pobrn@protonmail.com>","MIME-Version":"1.0","Content-Type":"text/plain; charset=utf-8","Content-Disposition":"inline","Content-Transfer-Encoding":"8bit","In-Reply-To":"<20250130115001.1129305-19-pobrn@protonmail.com>","X-BeenThere":"libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org","X-Mailman-Version":"2.1.29","Precedence":"list","List-Id":"","List-Unsubscribe":",\n\t","List-Archive":"","List-Post":"","List-Help":"","List-Subscribe":",\n\t","Errors-To":"libcamera-devel-bounces@lists.libcamera.org","Sender":"\"libcamera-devel\" "}},{"id":33323,"web_url":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/comment/33323/","msgid":"","date":"2025-02-10T08:04:23","subject":"Re: [RFC PATCH v3 18/21] apps: lc-compliance: Add multi-stream tests","submitter":{"id":133,"url":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/people/133/","name":"Pőcze Barnabás","email":"pobrn@protonmail.com"},"content":"Hi\n\n\n2025. február 6., csütörtök 18:24 keltezéssel, Jacopo Mondi írta:\n\n> Hi Barnabás\n>\n> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:51:35AM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:\n> > Rename the `SingleStream` test to `SimpleCapture`, and extend it\n> > to support using multiple roles. And instantiate another test suite\n>\n> s/And instantiate/instantiate/\n\nSorry, the intention is not clear to me. I see two options:\n\n (1) ... using multiple roles. Instantiate ...\n (2) ... using multiple roles; instantiate ...\n\n\n>\n> > from the `SimpleCapture` test that tests multiple streams in one\n> > capture session.\n> >\n> > Co-developed-by: Jacopo Mondi \n> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi \n> > Signed-off-by: Barnabás Pőcze \n> > Reviewed-by: Paul Elder \n> > ---\n> > src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/capture_test.cpp | 85 +++++++++++--------\n> > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)\n> >\n> > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/capture_test.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/capture_test.cpp\n> > index 147e17019..db1d52fc9 100644\n> > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/capture_test.cpp\n> > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/tests/capture_test.cpp\n> > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@\n> >\n> > #include \"capture.h\"\n> >\n> > -#include \n> > +#include \n> >\n> > #include \n> >\n> > @@ -18,19 +18,10 @@ namespace {\n> >\n> > using namespace libcamera;\n> >\n> > -const int NUMREQUESTS[] = { 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89 };\n> > -\n> > -const StreamRole ROLES[] = {\n> > -\tStreamRole::Raw,\n> > -\tStreamRole::StillCapture,\n> > -\tStreamRole::VideoRecording,\n> > -\tStreamRole::Viewfinder\n> > -};\n> > -\n> > -class SingleStream : public testing::TestWithParam>\n> > +class SimpleCapture : public testing::TestWithParam, int>>\n>\n> #include \n> #include \n>\n> vector should probably be included in capture.h\n\nI'll add it.\n\n\n>\n>\n> > {\n> > public:\n> > -\tstatic std::string nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo &info);\n> > +\tstatic std::string nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo &info);\n>\n> was\n> #include \n>\n> missing ?\n\nI'll add all three.\n\n\n>\n> >\n> > protected:\n> > \tvoid SetUp() override;\n> > @@ -43,7 +34,7 @@ protected:\n> > * We use gtest's SetUp() and TearDown() instead of constructor and destructor\n> > * in order to be able to assert on them.\n> > */\n> > -void SingleStream::SetUp()\n> > +void SimpleCapture::SetUp()\n> > {\n> > \tEnvironment *env = Environment::get();\n> >\n> > @@ -52,7 +43,7 @@ void SingleStream::SetUp()\n> > \tASSERT_EQ(camera_->acquire(), 0);\n> > }\n> >\n> > -void SingleStream::TearDown()\n> > +void SimpleCapture::TearDown()\n> > {\n> > \tif (!camera_)\n> > \t\treturn;\n> > @@ -61,19 +52,17 @@ void SingleStream::TearDown()\n> > \tcamera_.reset();\n> > }\n> >\n> > -std::string SingleStream::nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo &info)\n> > +std::string SimpleCapture::nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo &info)\n> > {\n> > -\tstd::map rolesMap = {\n> > -\t\t{ StreamRole::Raw, \"Raw\" },\n> > -\t\t{ StreamRole::StillCapture, \"StillCapture\" },\n> > -\t\t{ StreamRole::VideoRecording, \"VideoRecording\" },\n> > -\t\t{ StreamRole::Viewfinder, \"Viewfinder\" }\n> > -\t};\n> > +\tconst auto &[roles, numRequests] = info.param;\n> > +\tstd::ostringstream ss;\n> >\n> > -\tstd::string roleName = rolesMap[std::get<0>(info.param)];\n> > -\tstd::string numRequestsName = std::to_string(std::get<1>(info.param));\n> > +\tfor (StreamRole r : roles)\n> > +\t\tss << r << '_';\n> >\n> > -\treturn roleName + \"_\" + numRequestsName;\n> > +\tss << '_' << numRequests;\n> > +\n> > +\treturn std::move(ss).str();\n>\n> Does moving ss make any difference here ?\n\nNo, it does not change anything in C++17. It is there by accident.\n\n\n>\n> This apart\n> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi \n>\n> Thanks\n> j\n>\n> > }\n> >\n> > /*\n> > @@ -83,13 +72,13 @@ std::string SingleStream::nameParameters(const testing::TestParamInfo > * failure is a camera that completes less requests than the number of requests\n> > * queued.\n> > */\n> > -TEST_P(SingleStream, Capture)\n> > +TEST_P(SimpleCapture, Capture)\n> > {\n> > -\tauto [role, numRequests] = GetParam();\n> > +\tconst auto &[roles, numRequests] = GetParam();\n> >\n> > \tCapture capture(camera_);\n> >\n> > -\tcapture.configure(std::array{ role });\n> > +\tcapture.configure(roles);\n> >\n> > \tcapture.run(numRequests, numRequests);\n> > }\n> > @@ -101,14 +90,14 @@ TEST_P(SingleStream, Capture)\n> > * a camera that does not clean up correctly in its error path but is only\n> > * tested by single-capture applications.\n> > */\n> > -TEST_P(SingleStream, CaptureStartStop)\n> > +TEST_P(SimpleCapture, CaptureStartStop)\n> > {\n> > -\tauto [role, numRequests] = GetParam();\n> > +\tconst auto &[roles, numRequests] = GetParam();\n> > \tunsigned int numRepeats = 3;\n> >\n> > \tCapture capture(camera_);\n> >\n> > -\tcapture.configure(std::array{ role });\n> > +\tcapture.configure(roles);\n> >\n> > \tfor (unsigned int starts = 0; starts < numRepeats; starts++)\n> > \t\tcapture.run(numRequests, numRequests);\n> > @@ -121,21 +110,43 @@ TEST_P(SingleStream, CaptureStartStop)\n> > * is a camera that does not handle cancelation of buffers coming back from the\n> > * video device while stopping.\n> > */\n> > -TEST_P(SingleStream, UnbalancedStop)\n> > +TEST_P(SimpleCapture, UnbalancedStop)\n> > {\n> > -\tauto [role, numRequests] = GetParam();\n> > +\tconst auto &[roles, numRequests] = GetParam();\n> >\n> > \tCapture capture(camera_);\n> >\n> > -\tcapture.configure(std::array{ role });\n> > +\tcapture.configure(roles);\n> >\n> > \tcapture.run(numRequests);\n> > }\n> >\n> > -INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(CaptureTests,\n> > -\t\t\t SingleStream,\n> > -\t\t\t testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(ROLES),\n> > +const int NUMREQUESTS[] = { 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89 };\n> > +\n> > +const std::vector SINGLEROLES[] = {\n> > +\t{ StreamRole::Raw, },\n> > +\t{ StreamRole::StillCapture, },\n> > +\t{ StreamRole::VideoRecording, },\n> > +\t{ StreamRole::Viewfinder, },\n> > +};\n> > +\n> > +const std::vector MULTIROLES[] = {\n> > +\t{ StreamRole::Raw, StreamRole::StillCapture },\n> > +\t{ StreamRole::Raw, StreamRole::VideoRecording },\n> > +\t{ StreamRole::StillCapture, StreamRole::VideoRecording },\n> > +\t{ StreamRole::VideoRecording, StreamRole::VideoRecording },\n> > +};\n> > +\n> > +INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(SingleStream,\n> > +\t\t\t SimpleCapture,\n> > +\t\t\t testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(SINGLEROLES),\n> > +\t\t\t\t\t testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)),\n> > +\t\t\t SimpleCapture::nameParameters);\n> > +\n> > +INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(MultiStream,\n> > +\t\t\t SimpleCapture,\n> > +\t\t\t testing::Combine(testing::ValuesIn(MULTIROLES),\n> > \t\t\t\t\t testing::ValuesIn(NUMREQUESTS)),\n> > -\t\t\t SingleStream::nameParameters);\n> > +\t\t\t SimpleCapture::nameParameters);\n> >\n> > } /* namespace */\n> > --\n> > 2.48.1\n> >\n> >\n>","headers":{"Return-Path":"","X-Original-To":"parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org","Delivered-To":"parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org","Received":["from lancelot.ideasonboard.com (lancelot.ideasonboard.com\n\t[92.243.16.209])\n\tby patchwork.libcamera.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38B91C32AF\n\tfor ;\n\tMon, 10 Feb 2025 08:04:32 +0000 (UTC)","from lancelot.ideasonboard.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])\n\tby lancelot.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03A468600;\n\tMon, 10 Feb 2025 09:04:31 +0100 (CET)","from mail-40131.protonmail.ch (mail-40131.protonmail.ch\n\t[185.70.40.131])\n\tby lancelot.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A18685FF\n\tfor ;\n\tMon, 10 Feb 2025 09:04:29 +0100 (CET)"],"Authentication-Results":"lancelot.ideasonboard.com;\n\tdkim=fail reason=\"signature verification failed\" (2048-bit key;\n\tunprotected) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com\n\theader.b=\"umIWwRYH\"; dkim-atps=neutral","DKIM-Signature":"v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;\n\ts=protonmail3; t=1739174669; x=1739433869;\n\tbh=EdW7wVz0VWKX9jKCXzG+zWHI/fM2YHEoqwNte3AYKw0=;\n\th=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:\n\tFeedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:\n\tMessage-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post;\n\tb=umIWwRYHbFbVSrjzow7D0AWgl+bruvuOi7VLJxLQ2+kFVWJhw+agRv1kcYDIbFREB\n\tuTaaNQ4sfkqOdJxvRW8dNtAjlrnOqCJLEAiAzbYc1HvRyNrnyl8y5zVFE7m6GBy2fi\n\tc/LHQpaqomk/CqlrOxUB3bgBvvyQFCdKdfNg/K+uXI4fI8JvFLngY9EqOqA+eMlIDI\n\tBnZMSfPfXDC95uchyJkXev/61YFkBfgMgE+bBIwR4HmZ0+pXPSUXauWmCIw7Cy6uSP\n\t0IK71pZptX5O0xXg7ewgy//JxJftqFN+v/lFDZaZYmJhui1wXZLb/DLV0a7MVU44pJ\n\te/hbGG8HiW6RQ==","Date":"Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:04:23 +0000","To":"Jacopo Mondi ","From":"=?utf-8?q?Barnab=C3=A1s_P=C5=91cze?= ","Cc":"libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org,\n\tPaul Elder ","Subject":"Re: [RFC PATCH v3 18/21] apps: lc-compliance: Add multi-stream tests","Message-ID":"","In-Reply-To":"","References":"<20250130115001.1129305-1-pobrn@protonmail.com>\n\t<20250130115001.1129305-19-pobrn@protonmail.com>\n\t","Feedback-ID":"20568564:user:proton","X-Pm-Message-ID":"8fa1bf11f838a193ac0186b2419ebacac5a236fc","MIME-Version":"1.0","Content-Type":"text/plain; charset=utf-8","Content-Transfer-Encoding":"quoted-printable","X-BeenThere":"libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org","X-Mailman-Version":"2.1.29","Precedence":"list","List-Id":"","List-Unsubscribe":",\n\t","List-Archive":"","List-Post":"","List-Help":"","List-Subscribe":",\n\t","Errors-To":"libcamera-devel-bounces@lists.libcamera.org","Sender":"\"libcamera-devel\" "}}]