{"id":12812,"url":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/1.1/patches/12812/?format=json","web_url":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/patch/12812/","project":{"id":1,"url":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/1.1/projects/1/?format=json","name":"libcamera","link_name":"libcamera","list_id":"libcamera_core","list_email":"libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org","web_url":"","scm_url":"","webscm_url":""},"msgid":"<20210706142220.747614-1-umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>","date":"2021-07-06T14:22:20","name":"[libcamera-devel,RFC] camera_sensor: Do not always prioritize aspect-ratios","commit_ref":null,"pull_url":null,"state":"superseded","archived":false,"hash":"c0a4918ca4684cc2e331f434ba37441e8115b578","submitter":{"id":86,"url":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/1.1/people/86/?format=json","name":"Umang Jain","email":"umang.jain@ideasonboard.com"},"delegate":{"id":12,"url":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/1.1/users/12/?format=json","username":"uajain","first_name":"Umang","last_name":"Jain","email":"umang.jain@ideasonboard.com"},"mbox":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/patch/12812/mbox/","series":[{"id":2212,"url":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/1.1/series/2212/?format=json","web_url":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/project/libcamera/list/?series=2212","date":"2021-07-06T14:22:20","name":"[libcamera-devel,RFC] camera_sensor: Do not always prioritize aspect-ratios","version":1,"mbox":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/series/2212/mbox/"}],"comments":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/patches/12812/comments/","check":"pending","checks":"https://patchwork.libcamera.org/api/patches/12812/checks/","tags":{},"headers":{"Return-Path":"<libcamera-devel-bounces@lists.libcamera.org>","X-Original-To":"parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org","Delivered-To":"parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org","Received":["from lancelot.ideasonboard.com (lancelot.ideasonboard.com\n\t[92.243.16.209])\n\tby patchwork.libcamera.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D446BD794\n\tfor <parsemail@patchwork.libcamera.org>;\n\tTue,  6 Jul 2021 14:22:30 +0000 (UTC)","from lancelot.ideasonboard.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])\n\tby lancelot.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA143684EA;\n\tTue,  6 Jul 2021 16:22:29 +0200 (CEST)","from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com\n\t[IPv6:2001:4b98:dc2:55:216:3eff:fef7:d647])\n\tby lancelot.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21B7360288\n\tfor <libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org>;\n\tTue,  6 Jul 2021 16:22:28 +0200 (CEST)","from perceval.ideasonboard.com (unknown [103.251.226.59])\n\tby perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6027A5E;\n\tTue,  6 Jul 2021 16:22:26 +0200 (CEST)"],"Authentication-Results":"lancelot.ideasonboard.com;\n\tdkim=fail reason=\"signature verification failed\" (1024-bit key;\n\tunprotected) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com\n\theader.b=\"JxLx9MEz\"; dkim-atps=neutral","DKIM-Signature":"v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com;\n\ts=mail; t=1625581347;\n\tbh=SADRb4LmyLSLeImLAwgNKawSILoG6PjUEyGbx6WWUYY=;\n\th=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From;\n\tb=JxLx9MEzyVnHHf65TCjetWOjFdVdljUy1IfFlnZXVRVxgrLSKqZ8y/U5Oiw8kckn9\n\tOv1y49SEGjoxF8RdZTZtMAp1LiFBOZ9FIyD5fJfolhIz30u4E8vP5h2H4r7lby3gbz\n\tAOpm0xK19LkiwS+vVC+6Xgf++5Lcsqck3IhYQ37U=","From":"Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>","To":"libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org","Date":"Tue,  6 Jul 2021 19:52:20 +0530","Message-Id":"<20210706142220.747614-1-umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>","X-Mailer":"git-send-email 2.31.1","MIME-Version":"1.0","Content-Transfer-Encoding":"8bit","Subject":"[libcamera-devel] [RFC PATCH] camera_sensor: Do not always\n\tprioritize aspect-ratios","X-BeenThere":"libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org","X-Mailman-Version":"2.1.29","Precedence":"list","List-Id":"<libcamera-devel.lists.libcamera.org>","List-Unsubscribe":"<https://lists.libcamera.org/options/libcamera-devel>,\n\t<mailto:libcamera-devel-request@lists.libcamera.org?subject=unsubscribe>","List-Archive":"<https://lists.libcamera.org/pipermail/libcamera-devel/>","List-Post":"<mailto:libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org>","List-Help":"<mailto:libcamera-devel-request@lists.libcamera.org?subject=help>","List-Subscribe":"<https://lists.libcamera.org/listinfo/libcamera-devel>,\n\t<mailto:libcamera-devel-request@lists.libcamera.org?subject=subscribe>","Errors-To":"libcamera-devel-bounces@lists.libcamera.org","Sender":"\"libcamera-devel\" <libcamera-devel-bounces@lists.libcamera.org>"},"content":"In some cases, the maximum sensor resolution will provide the best\naspect-ratio for a requested stream size. It may also happen that,\nthe difference between max sensor resolution's aspect-ratio vs a lower\nsensor resolution aspect-ratio is very marginal(for e.g. <1%).\nIn such cases, we should actually lean towards the lower sensor\nresolution.\n\nOne of such cases is observed on nautilus, where all requested stream\nsizes seems to map to 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3. Even though, the aspect\nratios for lower sensor resolution aren't that far from 4208x3118.\nFor a stream size request of 1080p:\n - 1080p     = 1.777777778 (requested)\n\n - 4208x3118 = 1.349583066 (originally selected)\n - 2104x1560 = 1.348717949\n - 1048x780  = 1.343589744\n\nThis patch introduces some flexibility on part of sensor resolution\nselection procedure. It attempts to provide a sensor resolution,\nclosest to the requested stream size, whilst keeping best aspect-ratio.\n\nSigned-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>\n\n---\n- This patch has been written with \"[PATCH] camera_sensor: Remove\n  redundant aspect-ratio check\" applied.\n\n- There is also known issue/handle on why IPU3 currently selects max\n  sensor resolution config possible, we will use \"raw\" to see this patch\n  in action.\n\n- Findings via cam:\n\n(master)\n\n($)  cam -c1 -swidth=640,height=320,role=raw\nUsing camera \\_SB_.PCI0.I2C2.CAM0\n[10:12:57.975110123] [550]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\n[10:12:57.975199686] [550]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\nCamera configuration adjusted\n\n($)  cam -c1 -swidth=1280,height=720,role=raw\nUsing camera \\_SB_.PCI0.I2C2.CAM0\n[10:14:23.492963456] [651]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\n[10:14:23.493028736] [651]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\nCamera configuration adjusted\n\n($)  cam -c1 -swidth=1920,height=1080,role=raw\nUsing camera \\_SB_.PCI0.I2C2.CAM0\n[10:14:34.020592838] [660]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\n[10:14:34.020636493] [660]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\nCamera configuration adjusted\n\n($)  cam -c1 -swidth=3840,height=2160,role=raw\nUsing camera \\_SB_.PCI0.I2C2.CAM0\n[10:15:20.530557765] [727]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\n[10:15:20.530625404] [727]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\nCamera configuration adjusted\n\n($)  cam -c1 -swidth=4200,height=3000,role=raw\nUsing camera \\_SB_.PCI0.I2C2.CAM0\n[10:15:33.027468976] [737]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\n[10:15:33.027558684] [737]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\nCamera configuration adjusted\n\n\n(With this Patch)\n\n($)  cam -c1 -swidth=640,height=320,role=raw\nUsing camera \\_SB_.PCI0.I2C2.CAM0\n[10:19:04.270812870] [1457]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\n[10:19:04.270859868] [1457]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 1048x780-SGRBG10_IPU3\nCamera configuration adjusted\n\n($)  cam -c1 -swidth=1280,height=720,role=raw\nUsing camera \\_SB_.PCI0.I2C2.CAM0\n[10:19:15.515222045] [1465]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\n[10:19:15.515265834] [1465]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 2104x1560-SGRBG10_IPU3\nCamera configuration adjusted\n\n($)  cam -c1 -swidth=1920,height=1080,role=raw\nUsing camera \\_SB_.PCI0.I2C2.CAM0\n[10:19:23.333048232] [1471]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\n[10:19:23.333101431] [1471]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 2104x1560-SGRBG10_IPU3\nCamera configuration adjusted\n\n($)  cam -c1 -swidth=3840,height=2160,role=raw\nUsing camera \\_SB_.PCI0.I2C2.CAM0\n[10:19:29.774700339] [1480]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\n[10:19:29.774800035] [1480]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\nCamera configuration adjusted\n\n($)  cam -c1 -swidth=4200,height=3000,role=raw\nUsing camera \\_SB_.PCI0.I2C2.CAM0\n[10:19:59.786068223] [1541]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\n[10:19:59.786176204] [1541]  INFO IPU3 ipu3.cpp:277 CIO2 configuration: 4208x3118-SGRBG10_IPU3\nCamera configuration adjusted\n---\n src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp | 9 ++++++++-\n 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)","diff":"diff --git a/src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp b/src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp\nindex 1bf42acf..fb24480b 100644\n--- a/src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp\n+++ b/src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp\n@@ -569,7 +569,14 @@ V4L2SubdeviceFormat CameraSensor::getFormat(const std::vector<unsigned int> &mbu\n \t\t\tunsigned int area = sz.width * sz.height;\n \t\t\tunsigned int areaDiff = area - desiredArea;\n \n-\t\t\tif (ratioDiff > bestRatio)\n+\t\t\t/*\n+\t\t\t * Check if we have a better aspect ratio match than\n+\t\t\t * whatever we have seen before. ~1% change is acceptable\n+\t\t\t * if it leads to a selection of lower resolution below.\n+\t\t\t */\n+\t\t\tif (bestRatio == FLT_MAX)\n+\t\t\t\tbestRatio = ratioDiff;\n+\t\t\telse if (fabsf(ratioDiff - bestRatio) > 0.01)\n \t\t\t\tcontinue;\n \n \t\t\tif (areaDiff < bestArea) {\n","prefixes":["libcamera-devel","RFC"]}